2020 update : JC Verdier La Platine


A recent encounter with a JC Verdier dealer as well as a recent Audiogon discussion thread led to the start of this thread. He was in my house updating my La Platine which had been in storage for ten years with thread and oil. While he has high regards for the deck, his newer clients nevertheless prefer a Techdas iii than an 'old' La Platine. Given the proliferation of expensive decks in the past dozen years, La Platine has become very much under-appreciated. 

It's clear to me that the influence of the La Platine is everywhere to be found. Specifically, the magnetic suspension system that was employed 30+ years ago. Even SOTA offers their newer decks with mag. lev. features. And if you read this review: https://www.callas-audio.nl/Callas%20Platine%20Mod%20Kit%20Review.pdf, the Continuum Caliburn uses the same concept, which was not acknowledged in Fremer's review, albeit with more sophisticated , and expensive, execution.

It is also clear to me that there is much misunderstanding of the workings of the La Platine. I for one have contributed to this. The motor of the La Platine, for example, has been much maligned. The thread drive is another aspect of the turntable that have been described as inferior. With regard to the motor and thread drive, I have been set straight by Chris @ct0517 and Lyubomir @lbelchev. Experimenting with the different types of silk threads, the tightness to the platter  and a renewed understanding of the soundness of the Philips motor have been rewarded with better dynamics and transparency. 

The funny thing is that during the past two years of re-engagement with audio, I have questioned ownership of every components in my arsenal except the La Platine. It has always been a keeper. I wonder if La Platine owners would contribute to celebrating this 'old' deck with tales, advice, and insights?

Cheers!
ledoux1238

Hi @dover , thank you for the suggestion, really appreciated ! The materials you mentioned, especially the high density bamboo ply, are interesting, and I will certainly look into it! 

 

TT plinth material is a very interesting topic! Just for discussion sake, yes, for a long time, it was common believe among audiophiles that granite rings, and so not a good choice for making TT plinth! However, in recent years, a number of highly regarded TTs have used granite as plinth, including Verdier’s flagship the Magnum, and the CSport. The Kondo Ginga also has a base made of 2 pieces of granite of different thickness with a thin layer of copper/brass sandwich in between. It was because of these that I reconsider using granite as an option. 

 

I wonder if you have auditioned the CSport, and if so, what is your comment? Thanks

Hi @dover , one more question, is your TT the Final Audio Research VVT-1 with the outboard motor? I have a friend using this TT and has an extra motor, so I may borrow it to try on the Verdier smiley

@thekong 

Yes - that's my reference TT, has been for 40 years.

You must use silk thread - the pulley was designed for it - I use surgical silk - thickish end of the range.

I originally bought the Verdier as a 2nd deck for 78's and multiple arm playing around.

I have since completed a Garrard 301 for myself. Sold the Verdier to a friend.

I have put together a few 301's/401's for friends - both quartz stone ( SMD style dual layer ), Bamboo, and Bamboo/Birchply hybrid.

A quartzstone plinthed 401 with bronze platter I built for a friend operated very very close to a Kuzma M with the same arm/cartridge - 4point11/van den hul and Kuzma mc's.

Both the quartz stone and bamboo ( 40mm ) are very stable and can be machine very accurately.

Just remember on the plinth on the Verdier is the same weight as the platter. That's why they put steel plates under the MDF plinth. If you do a custom plinth make sure the mass is equal to or greater than the platter weight.

 

 

Hi @dover , I agree, as the Verdier has such a high CG, a massive plinth is likely to be beneficial, that’s also why I considered brass/aluminium/granite. I am assuming the high density bamboo ply is relatively light, so a slab of heavier material is probably needed to be bonded to the bottom of the bamboo ply plinth!

@thekong 

I used compressed bamboo ply - so it works out about roughly 10kg for 80mm plinth. The engineered stone would be more straightforward.

Suddenly had a brain explosion - it would be interesting to do a larger plinth and push the feet out to provide additional stability. Personally I don't subscribe to having a long belt - so you would still want the motor as close as possible.