tmalkki
Responses from tmalkki
Low volume listening dynamics Thank you again Bob. I think this is precisely what I was looking for: treading slowly into tube territory, but needing some good direction. I'll be jumping in this week.Best, Timo | |
Low volume listening dynamics Thanks Bob. I like where you're going with it. I've built some full range drivers with sealed and with transmission line cabinets, no crossovers of any kind, and the results have been very pleasing to me. The set amp is the next step for me. Thank... | |
Low volume listening dynamics Wow. I'll have to read that more than a few times. Thank you for the response. Yes I do enjoy the occasional foray into drivers and cabinets, a labor of love. Will do some (a ton) of research into your suggestions. | |
Low volume listening dynamics Adam F5 is an interesting new thought to consider, thank you. | |
Low volume listening dynamics One of the best parts of this (sometimes maddening) hobby is the range of choices, ideas, thoughts, methods and such. Somewhat recently I purchased a Primare I30, wanting to experience more of what reviewers were commenting on. It's an excellent i... | |
Low volume listening dynamics Thanks to everyone for sharing your expertise and experiences. Gives me a ton to think about. | |
Low volume listening dynamics Clams are happy, and so will I be too. Don't want to dominate this format at all, but would like a couple of suggestions on a good first timer tube integrated. Will probably build my own full range speaker pair, concentrating on high efficiency dr... | |
Low volume listening dynamics Great feedback, thank you guys. Perhaps this is the nudge I needed to whet my beak on the tube side of life with high sensitivity drivers. A private and personal musical experience, if you will. | |
Low volume listening dynamics Great, thank you for the feedback. You're right, 93 is already very sensitive, I may not need to search higher. Thanks again. |