roxy54
Responses from roxy54
| McIntosh -- good for show, not for sound, says dealer Bless you oldhvymec! | |
| McIntosh -- good for show, not for sound, says dealer "Mac is sort of like the Rolex of audio..." russ69, How many times has that stupid, meaningless sentence been uttered here? And you have to do it once more...it's embarrassing. | |
| Speaker Gratification That's nice if you enjoy that journey, which many of us would find to be torture. There are easier ways to get there, but good for you, you did it yourself! | |
| Your single most significant purchase mistake? sksos, I remember that company. It was started by an expat from Wilson Audio. I read good things too, they were supposed to be efficient for one thing. They went bell-up pretty fast though. That was a terrible financial loss for you. | |
| Your single most significant purchase mistake? Reference MM de Capo speakers. Everyone said they were great; reviewers and owners alike, so I bought a pair and hated them. They were soon gone. | |
| K-horn won't fit, any other corner speakers recommended for a big room? Audio Note, or for something different, Larsen. | |
| Your single most significant purchase mistake? Your wife wasn't a purchase, she was a commitment. | |
| Buyer Dispute That's why I said "until further notice". | |
| Contenders are here Good speakers. You're a lucky man! Enjoy. | |
| Great speaker sounds terrible in my room? Agree with jond...get them closer to the wall. | |
| Your single most significant purchase mistake? Focus Audio FS- 888 speakers. Recessed midrange, way too polite. Gorgeous burl veneer though. Also, De Havilland 845 monos. Simply didn't sound good with any speaker I had. | |
| About users with hidden agendas +1 jjss49 | |
| Share albums where EVERY SINGLE song is good October Project - Falling Farther In. | |
| Buyer Dispute I'm glad to hear that you dealt with your problem. The OP has dealt with his, so let it be until further notice. And I'm not your "dude". | |
| Tannoy Turnberry SE vs Kensington SE - Semi Review They are not violating any patents peter pan. |