rauliruegas
Responses from rauliruegas
| Do you know why Dear Jjrenman: ++++ " we don't know is how much that extra cost would cost the consumer. " +++++IMHO we are paying more because that non-existent QC. How much we paid for cartridges, protractors, tonearms, TTs, electronics and the like and how muc... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Dgarretson: Yes, could be controversial but what it's not in audio.I see digital source as an alternative ( as I see the MM/MI laternative to the LOMC one and lately the HOMC alternative. ) where IMHO today we can't any more close our " eyes/... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Harold-not-the-barrel: +++++ " It has always been dull and compressed and lacks the dynamics that music in real life is. " +++++well, analog neither has " the dynamics that music in real life is ".Today 32/192 or 32/384 lates DACs digital tec... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Stltrains: For me is very clear what you like and as I said it's each one free privilege.Regards and enjoy the music,R. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lewm: Good that you already had the Raidho experience. IMHO these danish " tiny " speakers mated with two powered subwoofers can shine in any room size, no doubt about.This is the only build difference between the C 1.1 ( that bI heard ) and ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear friends: Last weekend I had the opportunity to listen one of the latest speaker technology quality performance.A friend of mine call me to meet him to help to make the set up of his new speakers inside his new ( second room/system. ) listenin... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Dover: We must try that Tonar one, maybe the source for it is " 123 ": right?Regards and enjoy the music,R. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Stltrains: As you said to each his own but I can see you are a tube owner and tube technology is almost the same today that 40 years ago. This is very different for ss electronics that improved a lot over the years. IMHO using tube technology... | |
| TW 10.5 arm overhang set up? Dear Luna: Here you have the precise information about setting overhang:http://www.tw-acustic.de/media/bed-anl.pdfand trhough the TW protractor you can choose for different alignment geometry set up: Lofgren, Baerwald or Stevenson.Now, with the st... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lewm: Well, as many other things " degradation/corruption " goes deeper/advance through the time/years. Certainly that in those old times was different from today even " inside " the same reviewers.Regards and enjoy the music,R. | |
| Waaaah. Snapped off my cantilever. Even I can assure that the universal re-tipped cartridge specs are different from the original one.R. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Stltrains: ++++ " I have to believe that most if not all lps from the golden age of analog were voiced with our favorite cartridges. " +++++this is very good point and the first time I read about, not only the LPs but almost every audio item ... | |
| Do you know why and don't forget the off center LP hole that's is even more critical that the warped problem.R. | |
| Waaaah. Snapped off my cantilever. Dear Rodman99999: cartridge cantilever and cantilever build material is only a single part of the cartridge design, important yes but certainly not the one that makes the difference. A cartridge design is the sum of its parts where and through tho... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Fleib and friends: I found out this interesting cartridge comparison made it by M.Colloms in the 80's. I own, owned or heard all those cartridges but the Kiadea and VDH ( click on the DOWNLOAD . ):http://www.vinylengine.com/turntable_forum/vi... |