kr4
Responses from kr4
| sony tts 3000a tonearm setup question You need to tell us what arm this is. The top Sony arms of that era were the PUA-237 and PUA-286 and they are fairly complex to set up. You can google those names and see if that's what you have. If so, I have the user's manual for them.Kal | |
| New Revel Salon's being Introduced In 2006 "Pictures have been posted at Stereophile blogs and Sounstage website. I'm kind of disappointed. From the aesthetics point of view, I prefer the original design a lot more."I fully agree but the performance of the Salon2 easily made up for it. Bes... | |
| Do I need power conditioning for my new plasma? I am skeptical.Kal | |
| Do I need power conditioning for my new plasma? No more nor any less than you need for your other components. A good whole-house surge protector is important for any house.For video displays, you should also consider a local surge protector as well as surge protection on any video input signal ... | |
| Has anyone heard meridian No 51 Meridian No. 51? Do you mean Levinson No. 51?Kal | |
| Plasma mounting info Ooops. I meant neck strain, not next strain. Where's my coffee?Kal | |
| Plasma mounting info There have been many threads on many forums about monitor height and, obviously, it should be placed so that there is a minimum of next strain. Equally obviously, that depends on your seating and your posture. Thus, sitting in a slightly reclined ... | |
| Digital Cable Music Choice I prefer to use the digital output so that it can be converted by a decent DAC. Cannot comment on choice of cable.Kal | |
| Digital Cable Music Choice Waste of $$$.Kal | |
| Quality 5.1 receiver needed Well, any preamp can be faked into a bypass mode. All you need is a reliably fixed gain for it. A stepped volume-control makes that easy, of course, but fitting a marker or pin to the volume knob can work.Kal | |
| Quality 5.1 receiver needed You can keep it all. Just feed the line-level outputs for the main L/R channels from the receiver through a bypass input on the preamp.Kal | |
| Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Yes, exactly. Running Redbook through a processor is highly variable as there are many different processors, only some of which permit user intervention. In fact, I don't really consider that multichannel (well, it is multichannel output but the i... | |
| Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? " The reason I ask is it seems to me in a multi-channel environment regardless of what the source is sending it, the processor algorithms are what decides what goes to each speaker." Only with synthesized or matrixed materials. With discrete sourc... | |
| Conrad Johnson MET 1 6 channel Analogue help This is not a processor of any sort. It is an entirely analog 6 channel preamp. Any processing, except for channel levelling, must be done externally.Kal | |
| PS Audio Noise Harvester There are two long(!) threads about these on AVSforum.Kal |