g_nakamoto
Responses from g_nakamoto
| How does the Phase Linear 400 compare? i bought a new pl400 back in 1973. cheapest power amp back then with 200 watts per chanell!!! | |
| bose 1801 amplifier @crustycoot51, i do have 2 pairs of the 901 series 2 speaker. i have it mated to a mcintosh mc602 power amp! | |
| bose 1801 amplifier @roxy543,only because it's a bose and it doe's look pretty nice!! | |
| What country builds the best audio equipment? question should be, 'what country builds dependable equipment'?? | |
| Power Amplifiers i had a 'phase linear 400' i bought new back in the mid 70's! it cost 499.00! 'fried' my bose 901's! got rid of it in 2000! now i have a mcintosh mc602 amp!! | |
| Power Amplifier Longevity any thoughts on 'mcintosh' amps?? | |
| Bose 901 @barts47, i too had the series 2 i bought new way back. i heard that the series 1 and 2 sounded the best!! | |
| Bose 901 @crusty croot, the bose power amp was rated at 200 watts per chanel into 8 ohms and 400 watts into 4 ohms! with 4 901's it was called 'the super bose system'!!! | |
| Bose 901 @stretch, the bose 901 stands were not 'flimsy'!!! i have the seies 2 901's and their stands were pretty sturdy!!! | |
| Bose 901 i still have my 901 series 2 that i bought new back in the day! i'm not picky about sound but they're ok for me! | |
| Bose 901 i have my bose 901 series 2 that i bought back in the good old days. back then they were advertized as 'cadillac quality' in a volkswagon' space! they were said to need at least 100 watts per chanel because the 'eq' demanded 'power'!!! today bose ... | |
| Mark Levison no.36 has no lights at all when powered i would think that if your unit works, it must be a 'bulb' issue! | |
| Mark Levison no.36 has no lights at all when powered | |
| Mark Levison no.36 has no lights at all when powered maybe the 'bulbs' are burnt out! | |
| Stereo Receivers from the past... i still have my marantz 4300 4 chanell reciever. it stll works but is it worth giving it a 'tuneup'??? |