Does Apple Lossless + iTunes + Windows = Perfect

Kublakhan,

Thank you for taking the time to lay out this information so eloquently. I appreciate it big time! Those links are very informative.

Just to recap, I'll have to have uncompressed EAC files and the same files in Apple Lossless on the external hardrive. Then, I can put them into the iPod whichever way I like... Being that I'm going to use the iPod I believe that I have to move the files into it via iTunes, right? If so, I'd probably just stick with that rather than Foobar. Additionally, I think that I would have to use SlimServer with the SqueezeBox anyway.

Any progress in getting your questions resolved? I wish that I could help.

Thanks again.

I'm supposed to be working so i'm happy to spend the time writing here instead of writing my script. got a dog to walk? i'm there.

Ok, first when you burn a cd uncompressed the files aren't EAC files, they're wav files. EAC is simply the program that burns the cds as wav files. Wav files are said to be the most perfect copies. Steve at Empirical Audio seems to validate this based on his listening experience. (He's got a chart on his website that shows what he found regarding listening with mac vs pc, lossless v. wav, etc.) Apple will no doubt tell you there is no difference between a track burned as a wav file and one burned as an apple lossless file except that the latter is of smaller size so you can store more songs on your ipod and computer. Being so concerned with sound and not wanting to ever have to discover apple was wrong and thereby having to reburn my music, i'm going to stick with burning wav files only. The reason I suggested burning in Wav and also lossless was to have the 'best' copies on your computer for computer playback (wav) and get copies of them as lossless files to be able to put more songs on the limited ipod space as possible. However, it requires careful cataloging (you could burn every cd in wav and then create a playlist called, let's say "Lossless" in itunes, drag the wav files into that list and convert those to lossless (you simply highlight the tracks and using the advanced tab click 'convert to apple lossless' and it's done automatically for you. Then use that playlist to drag onto your ipod (again, only to save space.) I just tried this and a song that was 36.2 mb as a wav file became 24.2 as a lossless file so you can do the math and determine if the extra work is worth the space you save.

Of course, if getting as many songs on your ipod isn't that important and you want to be sure to have the absolute best copy of your tracks on your computer, i would just burn everything in wav and if you use itunes that's fine. you can load up your ipod with wav files...no reason to convert (other than to save some space.) if you decide to use foobar (which is said to sound better when using a pc than using itunes with a pc) that's fine too. the music is on your hard drive and doesn't care what program you use to listen to it...change as often as you like and experiment with no harm to your original music files.

One big consideration would be this: If you were to burn your cds as lossless files, can you ever go back to wav files if suddenly everyone starts saying these are indeed better? I don't think you can but i'm not sure. Therefore, the safest bet is to just go wav. that answers your original question #2. don't wait, burn to wav and you can always convert automatically to lossless if you want down the road.

to answer your original quesion #1: steve at empirical audio claims that apple is correct: lossless files heard through a mac sound better than through a pc. again, check the chart at http://www.empiricalaudio.com/ (click on computer audio and scroll down) to see what steve's ears told him during his a/b testing.

From reading related threads on AgoN, I gather that many of us are happy storing our music as Apple Lossless files, because we can't hear any difference between AL and WAV or AIFF. Also, John Atkinson in Stereophile examined files that were converted into AL and then converted back to lossless format and found that the result was a bit perfect copy of the original (article can be found by searching stereophile.com). So, there is analytical reassurance, if that helps.

BTW, Apple Lossless files can be converted to WAV files, but there's not much point to it. If one is persuaded that AL is truly lossless, there's no reason to go back to larger files. If one is not, then the reconverted WAV files wouldn't be as good as the originals, so why would you want them?

Kubla, I use iTunes on Macs, so can't address most of your questions. But with respect to compilations, check to see that the "part of a compilation" box is checked in the file's Get Info window. iTunes always stores by artist, except if this box is checked. Then it stores by album title inside a folder called "Compilations."

For more info on aspects of computer audio (including wav v. lossless, etc, you should see this thread:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?ddgtl&1139715855&openmine&zzKublakhan&4&5#Kublakhan

The posts by Edesilva are particularly helpful, especially the last several which describe moving your audio files around on hard drives.

I think there is an iTunes for dummies book. if they had a foobar for dummies i would buy it

Hello Mdp0430,
You know what, I ask the same question back in march-06.

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?ddgtl&1142083451

I found the answer in this thread

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?icomp&1139784453

In the end, the answer is

Windows iTunes->AX->Toslink->DAC is BIT PERFECT and it does bypass k-mixer

Regards