Does your system take you there or...?

HA...next time I listen to Bill Evans' "Waltz for Debby" I'm gonna rattle the icecubes in a manhattan, smoke a Pell Mell, and try not to ignite the hairspray in Judith From Accounting's beehive while apologizing for causing a run in her stocking from an errant brush with my wingtip.

With live jazz you're only going to get the "being there" mojo by sitting directly in front of the band (usually a good thing requiring luck)...otherwise, although it can still be a way cool experience, sitting anyplace else makes you subject to the whims of an often cheezy sound system run by itself ("set it and forget it"), or by Clem, the disinterested and underpayed hearing impaired soundman glued to his iPhone.

Indeed some prefer one over the other, and if a reviewer is prone to being in the "music came to me "group, themn all his reviews of gear will be different than the reviewer who prefers to "be there in the studio during the recording".

Which is more appealing to you now may not be the same in a few years.

I read all the time about aging audiophiles who long for the old sound of days gone by, definetly not the studio control room folks, but the more romantic types.
They don't mind giving up detail for what they percieve as musicality.

Personally I don't get that.

Nope, I want my cake and eat it too.

I want to be transported to the studio and have all the music that was recorded returned to me in full detail with all the musicality intact.

I've heard systems like this. They were quite expensive.
The gear disappeared and just the music filled the room.
The room was full of detail and musicality.

Then I discovered that it wasn't just about throwing bucks at the components like speakers amps and sources.

That liquid detailed sound was also due to some other things going on in the background that weren't as obvious as the exotic speakers and amps were.

It was upgrade power to the gear that made the music sound more pleasurable.
The upgrading done to the already great sounding pricey components made the sound even better.

This I could afford, and I've been quite amazed and pleased that such improvements are available to we folks who would love to swim with the big fishes but just can't afford to.

You can and do get the best of both worlds if you try.

If the recording is a studio multi track type, you'll know it and yet it will still please the ear.
If it's a more natural,less processed recording,you;ll notice it.

You'll be able to live in both worlds and enjoy both.
You won't be confined to a system that's always in your face, or a system that always puts your face in a studio.

It takes time to assemble a system like this, and personally I spent years floating about in this hobby changing amps and speakers, yet never getting the full measure of any of them.

If it wasn't for my good fortune to be able to listen to some very good systems that paid just as much attention to the "things that can't make a differece"as to the things most of us think matter most, then I would still be out there wandering in the desert of audio discontent.

Now when I listen to the music I let it take me wherever it wants to, and I enjoy the ride.

Onemug - that was a great post.

And Wolf_garcia, I think I was there with the same drinkers and clinkers. Bill Evans LPs can be among the very best.

I was listening to "Waltz for Debbie" again today while breaking-in a new tonearm cable...maybe it was my mood or something but man...I was transported once again by that LP and those ghosty crowd voices were right there with me. I had planned to listen for a few minutes and move on to something else but I was transfixed and had to hear both sides...suffice to say the new tonearm cable works just fine. I have a nice sounding CD of other stuff from the same gigs ("Live at the Village Vanguard") and weirdly the crowd sounds are much less obvious...makes me wonder if they were isolated somehow and edited out...weird.

IMO/E the difference lies in the presentation: forward sounding speakers/gear brings some/all of the players into the room; a less forward presentation takes me to the event (which I prefer); a subdued presentation takes me to the coat room at the event.