Why 24/7 warm-up period on amps?


The 24/7 warm-up period on amps seems excessively unsupported. Yes, an amplifier (pre-amp or power amp) will change it's circuit factors as the init heats up since the resistive and capacitive values stabilize...but for months on end? Do we still have a "warm" heart for tubes, that do indeed need to get "hot" to work right?

A capacitor charges up based on it's RC time constant, which is in the SECONDS range, not days. OK, if you add the heat sink area so the heat going out is stabilized I can see maybe an hour or so. My DNA-225 gets HOT in thirty minutes, at which point it's steady state. That even assumes it doesn't have temperature correction circuits to make it more stable, and less subject to change over time.

Break-in periods are hard to judge what people think is happening. Circuit P/N junction temps get hot pretty fast. A mechanical device like a speaker or phono cartridge, sure, they will work-in just like a well used rubber band. But silicone? Factory burn-in is designed to find weak components that degrade outside of SOP ranges, not to "center" their attributes in a normal stable circuit. Did someone forget to add enough heat sink compound to a PNP or NPN transistor, for instance?

Assumming break-in is real, not to be confused with the warm-up period, once it's done it's done. After that it would be warm-up only time. And, warm-up is a simple thermodynamic process. It only takes so long to warm-up and it isn't "days" on end. Maybe hours...if even. Once things are to temp the circuit constants are set. What else is changing? A heat sink is designed to warm-up and hold a delta temperature where the measured performnace is flat. A small amp (pre-amp gain stage) has smaller heat sinks for this reason. Heat and resistance are related, so you have to pick a temp and hold it. You design to THAT attrubute on the component.

Wire conditioning in the amp? ( go here - http://www.angelfire.com/ab3/mjramp/golopid/grain.html) As well as several other sites and textbooks.

The DC path is just that, DC. The magic is the purity of the DC, not the wire moving it around. You either have the right voltage and current capability (wire size)or you don't. Once the amp is on, the wires capacitance hardly matters. PP, PE or Teflon dielectrics only ionizes-tree and fail at break down voltages around impurities, not below that. You do not want to ever ionize the insulation in normal practice.

AC is an interesting issue. The AC complex signal is ALTERNATING differently at each and every frequency point, so the magnetic and electric fileds keep switching with respect to frequency. So the dielectric can not have polarity, or current "direction". The dielectric will not "align" to anything.

Grain structure in copper does not change unless you melt it. It's set when the rod is made. Annealing just resets elongation by improving homogeneous grain alignment, not the grain boundary characteristics since wire is resitive annealed at well below the temp that would fully reform the grain boundary around impurities in the copper. Oh, all modern 9/16" rod copper is made in induction ovens and is essentially OFC grade. All wire is drawn from that rod. Modern copper is also "high conductivity". Again, these terms are throw backs to days gone by with coke furnaces and open air annealing to critical temps where impurities could be picked up, changing the grain boundaries around impurities.

I also notice the people seem to tout TEFLON over Polypropylene or polyethylene dielectrics. Teflon costs more, it is higher temperature capable to 150C-200C (like 80C on polyethylene isn't enough in electronics) but Teflon has a worse dissipation factor and loss tangent. Using Teflon has a more NEGATIVE influence on electricals than olefins. Teflon's velocity of propogation at RF frequencies way above 1MHz is 70% verses 66% for solid olefin dielectrics. But that is at RF. And, you can nitrogen foam either to negate that advantage of Teflon at RF, but NOT Teflon's high price, loss tangent or dissipation factor. Capacitance adjusted Teflon is a poor choice. So the important factors are capacitance, dissipation factor and loss tangent. We can easily fix the velocity of propagation. PE and PP is superior across the board and cheaper (that's probably the problem!).

Good circuits are good circuits. Could you even make a circuit that had electricals parameters that were undefined till it ran, "forever"? Nope, can't be done. Design would then be a game of chance. I don't think that it is. Stabilized junction temps are used to set electrical componenet attributes with respect to temperature. You can design heat sink characteristics to place "hot" components where thet need to be temp wise to meet a circuit requirement. A poorly designed amp that allows thermal run-away under load isn't appropriate and isn't made...for long. There is indeed a circuit junction temp that rather quickly defines the measurable performance of the circuit, and a STABLE delta attribute approximation(s) when a circuit is designed. You know going in what they will be in operation steady state.

So, I hear my speakers and phone stage "break-in. And they don't go backwards once thet are broken-in. They can, in fact, get worse and simply break-down! But my amp sounds fine in short order. The circuit reaches a thermodynamic steady state and we're off to the races. I just can't see a circuit that needs 24/7 "on" period to stabilize...unless it just isn't stable. To me that's a poor design, and one subject to possibly serious load induced instability when the circuit falls outside of the stable design region(s).

I'd sure like to see MEASURED attributes that support 24 /7 warm-ups on sound. I have yet to see any measured data to support this. Show me components used in amps that take MONTHS to reach stady values. I have read PLENTY to support first to third approximation(s) on amplifier circuits ambient thermal temperature stability points. Many circuits are designed to run "cold" and have inverse circuit systems to keep changes due to temp deltas away. This way, you have a more stable circuit at all times. The opposite designis technically UNSTABLE till it gets to temp. This also limits what you can do as it can't blow-up when it is cold BEFORE it gets hot and stable. So the circuit is a compromise.

So just what are the resistive, inductive and capacitive break-in periods on quality components used in a circuit? In God we trust, all else bring data.- unknown
rower30
I thought I heard a dissipation of the "solid state fog" from my Bryston 3B-SST when I left it on for more than a day. But it may be that Elizabeth planted that suggestion in my head.

In any case, no amount of warmup makes the Bryston sound as good as my tube amps, which don't seem to need much warm up at all. The tube amps go off at night to conserve tube life.

Even though it doesn't get very warm, the Bryston uses up as much power at idle as two 60W bulbs, and would you leave two bright lamps on all day and night? What would our parents say about such profligacy?
My solid state gear stays on 24/7/52 , can't argue the reasons why , but I've found large SS power amps definitely sound better , smother when left on continuously . The tube gear I've owned sounded ok after one hour of use .
The power bill didn't change much going from tubes that were on part time to SS that was on all the time .
Rower30. Brilliant stuff and I salute you. The whole issue of AC is fascinating to me. Many of us have reported that our gear sounds considerably better late at night and I am not convinced it is just the alcohol as I quit drinking many months ago and have experienced several fabulous late-night sessions since. There's no question that power demands and atmospheric conditions change as night settles in and could thus effect the signal in some (positive) way. I acknowledge that I do NOT use a conditioner but if I follow your argument, the power is undergoing transformation to DC within in given unit anyway so it *should* not matter.

I've even had a guy with a masters in physics (teaches at a local community college) tell me that one amplifier is as good as another but I'm sorry, when I replaced an Adcom 5802 with a McIntosh MC402 there was simply no comparison.

I know this is a crazy question but is it possible that the length of dissimilar conductors with varying dielectrical properties can have varying effects, positive or negative, in terms of introducing, eliminating, or altering interference? Before you laugh, I think of the radio antennae which, getting longer, pulls in a progressively better signal. Does an unprotected stretch of conductor automatically serve as a lightning rod for intereference (the notion of capping all open RCA does seem a bit over-the-top to me but...)

Lastly, not throwing gasoline on the fire (or not wanting to ;-) ) sound coming through my best interconnects still BLOWS AWAY the sound coming through my low-grade ICs, ditto speaker cable. I mean, it's not even close. Power cords are a bit less dramatic a change (maybe I haven't spent enough money ;-) ). I've had to listen hard to hear a difference with the JPS Digital AC-X I'm auditioning for my CDP but I believe there is a qualitative difference, if a subtle one. It might even be worth $400.

Like in politics we have people sitting on two sides of an aisle, but not everyone can be, or must be, a stubborn fool. Isn't it possible that we have people who really are capable of being objective listeners and who don't talk themselves into hearing differences that do not exist in reality? And can't they be sitting on either side of the aisle at different times? As in life, nobody is right all of the time and nobody "knows" everything.

I always like the discussion, as long as it stays civil, as it's alternately informative and amusing.
09-13-11: Paperw8
the equation for dB measurement is:
q_dB=10*log(q1/q2)
where q1 and q2 are measured quantities and q_dB is the dB measurement for those quantities. when q1=q2/2, q_dB is -3dB.
if you read closely the reference that you cited, you can see that what the writer is saying is clearly wrong. 6dB/octave is the falloff for a *second* order filter; the filter shown in the cited reference is a first order filter.
Paperw8, we had discussed the definition of db for electrical signals in another thread a while back, and as I indicated then, with all due respect you are simply wrong. Please do some further research, and I think you will see that:

db = 10log(P1/P2) = 20log(V1/V2)

where P1/P2 is the ratio of two powers, and V1/V2 is the ratio of two voltages. 6db is 6db, regardless of whether it is derived on the basis of power (where it represents a factor of 4) or voltage (where it represents a factor of 2).

I should qualify my statement about 6db/octave rolloff for a first order filter, though, by adding that at frequencies that are just a small amount higher than the 3db point (Fc) the rolloff will be somewhat less than 6db/octave. As frequency increases further the rate of rolloff will become progressively closer to 6db/octave. The actual equation is:

Vout/Vin = 1/(square root(1 + (f/Fc)^2))

During the first octave above Fc, a rolloff of about 4db will occur. As f increases further, the "1" in the denominator becomes progressively less significant, bringing the rolloff rate progressively closer to 6db/octave.

Regards,
-- Al
thanks for the power usage formula Al. had no idea my gear sucked up that much juice doing nothing.

gotta say this is one of the most interesting threads i've ever read here. very impressive considering i can only comprehend about 50% of what you guys are discussing. spent 10x more time google-ing definitions then actually reading the thread, but i should have the remaining 50% nailed down by the end of the year =)

fascinating stuff guys...thanks.