Which is best amp, Mccormack 125, Belles 150 or

The McCormack and Belles are both excellent. Can't go wrong with either. I don't know the Vincent.

Cbman> Do you mean which is the better amp ?? mated to what ??
Narrod>Would you say both are excellent if they had to drive BIG Maggies,M-L's,or Apogee's ??

I have owned the DNA-125 for 6 months and have been greatly rewarded with powerful bass, smooth and articulate midrange, and sweet, extended highs, bringing you the entire spectrum of musical color. I have it paired with Dynaudio Contour S1.4s At 125 watts per channel, the DNA-125 has plenty of power. I too was considering the Belles, but decided on the Mccormack after reading several positive reviews and listening to it for myself.

I have a DNA 125 and it's the first amp I've ever owned that made me stop thinking about upgrading and I've owned quite a few, both tube and solid state. I liked it so much that I picked up a RLD-1 preamp a few weeks later.

The 125 is smooth and musical, it is so good for the money that once you hear it you know that it was money well spent. I replaced a McIntosh C15 pre and MC7100 amp with the McCormacks and don't regret it at all.