Building high-end 'tables cheap at Home Despot II


“For those who want the moon but can't afford it or those who can afford it but like to have fun and work with their hands, I'm willing to give out a recipe for a true high-end 'table which is easy to do, and fun to make as sky's the limit on design/creativity! The cost of materials, including 'table, is roughly $200 (depending, more or less), and add to that a Rega tonearm. The results are astonishing. I'll even tell/show you how to make chipboard look like marble and fool and impress all your friends. If there's interest I'll get on with this project, if not, I'll just continue making them in my basement. The next one I make will have a Corian top and have a zebra stripe pattern! Fun! Any takers?”

The Lead in “Da Thread” as posted by Johnnantais - 2-01-04

Let the saga continue. Sail on, oh ships of Lenco!
mario_b
Hi Mike and all: I just substituted the original metal ball for the ceramic ball and heard a HUGE increase in bass power, midbass, and actual transparency, if perhaps a loss of some imaging focus, which may be addressed by other means (loading of the cartridge, speaker placement, etc.), so I have to declare the ceramic ball a Danger to the Lenco Mightiness, a Gelding of the Mighty Bull. Had the Lenco on Cyprus had the ceramic ball, the EMT would have been declared to winner in terms of power and PRaT, while the Lenco would have been deemed analytical. But, the Lenco surpassed the EMT in every area, offering a superior sense of limitless fluid POWER against the EMT's Garrard-like oversimplification of rhythm and timing (the Lenco offering a finer and more detailed exposition of complex timing which escaped the EMT, while clearly outperforming it in every audiophile area, like detail, imaging, decay/air and so on).

The Lenco I heard yesterday in the extreme high-end system, before the bearing-ectomy, sounded like the best turntable in the world bar none (Giant Direct Coupled Glas-Reinforced Lenco/Dynavector 507 MKII/Dynavector 17D MKIII), a Destroyer of EMTs and any belt-drive or DD you care to mention. The POWER, detail, SLAM, speed, transients and bass, with the familiar Amazon-like sense of barely-tapped limitless reserve, had to be heard to be believed (even I found it hard to credit). But after the bearing-ectomy, it sounded like a massive pricey belt-drive with an acrylic platter: analytical with overdamped bass and mushy low bass (speaking relative to idlers), the magic was GONE.

The ceramic bearing acts as a comb filter, filtering out some frequencies - specifically the mid-to-upper bass, precisely where the MOST striking difference between idlers and belt-drives exists - and exaggerating others (upper mids to high frequencies), thus creating this illusion of increased transparency and detail.

Now, I am not now going to try to match a ceramic bearing to the precise thrust-plate necessary to make it work, for now anyway, as here I will trust my gut reactions, as I did when I first heard an idler, when I first heard a Lenco, and when I first heard the birch-ply/MDF recipe I had been recommending and promoting on grounds of logic (CLD plus mass, avoidance of overdamping, but materials which will absorb rather than reflect energies....a perfect balance, intuitively/logically), but had not actually tried in the beginning. In each of these cases there was a Rightness which immediately struck a biological/emotional response, and a physical response (i.e. my ears saying Holy Crap and perking up like bunny ears)!!

Now many audiophiles like to dismiss these types of responses as subjective and so declare them meaningless and misleading. But music IS an emotional and biological experience (the urge to dance, to cry, to scream, to make trouble...), as well as an intellectual experience (the mathematical beauty of Baroque classical music, better exposed by a the Subtle but Mighty Lenco than anything else out there) and so to dismiss this makes no logical sense. We MUST trust our instincts. If I have a particular talent, it is my ability to recognize these responses in myself and be able to immediately chuck all I realize on the instant I had erroneaously believed (as when I, proud owner of two high-end belt-drive turntables heard my first idler) in favour of the contradictory experience (i.e humble modded Garrard SP-25 kicks the shit out of high-end belt-drives in all musically-important areas).

Now, it must be said that I seem to be able to extract more from Lencos and other idlers than many others whose Lencos fall short of the mark set by the Lencos I send out as ambassadors. This is largely due to audiophiles' weakness for the exotic and the complex. And so they rush out and apply - without comparison, this is VERY important - the latest flavour-of-the-month materials (i.e. bubinga wood and Ipe which reflect rather than absorb, approaching stone and metal for hardness and so on; ceramic and acrylic which both act as comb filters [in the absence of bonding/CLD-ing], the latest fashionable motors, etc.) and techniques (i.e decoupling which mitigates POWER and focus, separate arm-pods which introduce relative motion, materials which over-damp, and so on) without regard to logic (relative motion, overdamping, underdamping, etc, which should be evident without the experiment.).

I'm convinced that part of the Secret of the Mighty Idlers is the use of simple metal (platter) and wood (wood allowing Direct Coupling which is SUCH a HUGE improvement while reflective stone does not allow this). So, the metal to metal bearing works well, as it does in the platter itself, as does the use of birch-ply/MDF, which offers a perfect balance of mass/weight and just the right note of hardness/softness, absorbing without overdamping, solditidy which leads to incredible bass, SLAM, dynamics, transients and tonal correctness from the highest to the lowest frequencies. This last CLD recipe may not be exotic, but it is incredibly effective, as is instantly heard when tried. Wich is to say, the original Lenco parts, properly cleaned, relubed, restored, and set-up, are absolutely incredible in their seemingly limitless potential and actual results. The only parts I've found so far which exhibit any wear are, indeed, the nylon thrust plates, which dimple.

This doesn't mean I won't be seeking to improve this aspect: for instance I am trying to source new teflon thrust plates, and will look into thicker steel thrust plates (which like Reinderspeter's top-plate should improve overall sound quality without affecting the balance...the Mighty Amazon in Full Flow Lenco POWER, which must NOT be mitigated/compromised, only further improved!!!). I will also test out varying metal ball bearings. But I'll stick to metal, as my guts/ears attest.

As to the cleaning regimen Mike, long ago I reported on the restoration and replinthing of an NOS grease-bearing Garrard 301. Now the grease - an organic compound - had degenerated and formed invisible coral reefs on the metal of the shaft and bronze bushings of the main bearing. I discovered this when, after two cleaning of solvents, the now-shiny main bearing continued to stick in precisely the same places where it had stuck while the original grease was still in there. I scratched my head, and pulled out my handy-dandy Bullshit-Free metal cleaner: powdered and water-soluble Cameo pot and pan cleaner. I bought a pipe cleaner, and applied myself to both the interior of the bearing and the exterior of the main shaft. I blew compressed air through the bearing, made up my new Mobil 1-based grease (matched in consistency to the original honey-like grease) and discovered that the bearing now revolved smoothly with no problems.

My next Garrard experience came with an oil-bearing 301, which had no sticking problems, so I performed the usual solvent baths sans-Cameo, Direct Coupled it to the usual high-mass CLD recipe, and found it to be far short of the Lenco in performance. Again I scratched my head, and again I pulled out my Cameo, but this time introduced a new element: a 24-hour submersion in WD-40, an excellent solvent. Watch your brass and other metals magically come out shiny and new-looking!! THEN I applied myself with the Cameo, pipe cleaners and stiff sponges. After all this and the compressed air and new syntheitc lubrication, I reassembled everything and found the Garrard to be in the same ball-park as the Lenco.

But, the Lenco being so good without this obssessive cleaning regimen (using the solvent baths but no Cameo as it didn't seem an issue), I let well enough alone, only finally trying it out with the Lenco (which having such a smaller bearing/bushing, required lengthy polishing using Q-tips to scrub with the Cameo) this past week. WHAT a difference (which I erroneously concluded was due to the ceramic ball)!! The platter revolved so long I went away and had a nap. And sonically, a tranformation (leaving the metal ball in place). The moral of this story is: solvent are not enough. The old lubricants are organic (as are even most synthetics today as they are not purely synthetic as I discovered when I bought some purely synthetic stuff on Cyprus), and they degenerate over time, creating invisible bacterial colonies which must be scrubbed away to restore the sonics/potential fully.

NOW we are approaching the Full Idler Potential: obssessive treatment/addrssing of various issues - without replacing parts - leads to incredible heights of sonic fireworks and bliss!!! Interfering with the original recipe by resorting to new materials may lead to a Gelding of the Bull, and incorrect conclusions as to the power and true potential of idler-wheel drives. Do not rush to embrace the latest exotic materials and complex techniques without first hearing the context: a properly-restored and logically and practically designed plinth/tonearm set-up. THEN test out your new materials and techniques, as how otherwise are your conclusions valid (this argument goes back to the earliest days of the original thread, when several sought to "improve" the Lenco by replacing the fabulous motor and adapting it to belt-drive!!)?!? Not to mention the fact that these gelded bulls then become ambassadors, and end up holding back the rising Idler Tide (properly restored and set-up idlers are superior in every way to their belt and dircet-drive competitors...it's just that there remain ways to improve performance without affecting the powers and balance of these machines, like the Cleaning Regimen). Short form: don't fall for bullshit, embrace results.

Anyway, that's enough for now, have fun all!! Vive la Lenco, Vive la Idler-Wheel (which - already awesome in earliest days - continues to climb the Sonic Ladder)!!
Oops, thanks Mike for the research, I leave it to you to source the various elements and get back to us with the results ;-)!! I've taken the first steps in having new teflon thrust-plates made too. Now to treat my "Ultra Lenco" and see which incredible place it takes me: Why don't you come with me, little girl, on a Magic Carper Ride!!!!
Just a quick note on the use of Stillpoints with the Lenco. I've kept the bolt feet on, but they sit on a layered base of maple and acrylic with large size Stillpoints under the base just below where the bolt feet rest on top. Adding the Stillpoints definitely improves detail retrieval, and does it in a way that sounds smooth and full. Putting Aurios under the base also improves detail retrieval, and makes for a brighter sound. Brass cones sound more like the Aurios. Which is best is depends on whether you want to go 'richer' or 'brighter,' but it's an improvement either way.
Jean,
Thanks for holding the Lenco flag so high and proud.
I am in total agreement, the Lenco should be left as it is- with regards to its integral parts; motor, base plate, idler wheel mechanism, spindle.
Please do replace the plinth using the recipe of baltic birch ply and MDF, and replace the arm with an affordable Rega. Once one gets a feel for what wonderful machines these oldies but goodies truly are, then go to the Lenco laboratory for further experiments and improvements.
Lucky for us, we have the know how at our fingertips-thanks to the Lenco aficionados on this wonderful site.
The Lenco is a KILLER!
Remember- friends don't let friends use belt drives.
Thanks for that Michael, as always your posts are a hoot!! And thanks for the report of the footer experiments Bob, I keep hearing about the use of Stillpoints, I'll have to get around to trying these.

Well, yesterday I staged a BIG round of tonearm/cartridge comparisons, with REALLY good news for those on a budget!! As I've often written, I've been trying to get the RS-A1 to match the Mighty JMW/Ortofon Jubilee combo, so I had acquired a Monster Cable Sigma Genesis 2000 to replace the Denon DL-103"E" (great, but low bass is essentially absent, it's a mid-bass champ, which means it fits into the usual 40 Hz or mini monitor speaker systems perfectly...midrange GORGEOUS) on the RS-A1 which actually took the lead!!...for a while. Then I installed one of the newly-treated main bearings on the Ultra Lenco - with the usual playing overnight at 78 RPM, which makes a BIG difference in getting the new lubricant sunk into the bronze bushings to reduce noise - and the JMW/Ortofon Jubilee (which has absolutely state of the art bass which shames anything else I've heard, and this is a BIG plus on idler-wheel drives as it allows Full Restitution of the LPs) once again took a significant lead. THEN I hooked up the humble re-wired Sonus (a low-mass variant of the Mayware tonearm) with the Satin M-117Z (roughly $400 at eBay prices), and, incredibly, this in overall terms matched the JMW/Ortofon (at roughly $4K new), falling behind in some areas, and surpassing it in others. Surprisingly, it matched and perhaps beat the JMW/Ortofon in the bass!!!

Now the Satin cartridges are truly strange creatures, high-output MCs - which almost always fall far behind low-output MCs in absolute sound quality terms - which have removable styluses. Not only that, but the stylus assembly is held in place by simple magnetism, nothing else. Now this last fact explains why the erstwhile beautiful but flawed Satin only bloomed when matched to the ultra-low-mass Sonus: anything heavier caused relative movement of the stylus assembly because of simple mass/momentum. But with the Sonus, the stylus remains in place and a stunning amount and quality of bass emerged. The Satin was waiting for the Sonus all this time to bloom.

Getting back to the Tale of Rumble, the Sonus/Satin was unplayable at higher volume via the reflex-loaded (ported) Athenas due to the low-frequency feedback loop I had written about back a few posts. But with the three-way Yamaha NS-690s (which belong to the famed NS-1000 line), which are acoustic suspensions speakers (i.e. no port), but actually go deeper in the bass than the Athenas, the Sonus/Satin is playable with no volume limits, no rumble, no feedback loop. Now, reflex loading leads to mushier, less controlled bass (but higher efficiency/sensitivity figures), while acoustic suspension speakers traditionally have tighter, more tuneful bass (but lower efficiency figures as it takes more power to move the drivers). The reflex-loaded Athenas picked up and amplified otherwise inaudible low-frequency noise, which moved the furniture, and cycled it in an escalating feedback loop. So again, reports of idlers and rumble are due not to the idlers themselves (i.e. the rumble is not intrinsic) but is due to the fact that mass-loaded idler-wheel drives have no lower limit in the bass, and so retrieve bass noise, which leads to amplification and low-frequency feedback loops. I point out here that belt-drives do not usually exhibit these problems, for the simple fact they cannot match idler-wheel drives in the bass, period.

Anyway, good news to budget-minded audiophiles/music lovers, you can, given proper matching, achieve state-of-the-art results on a budget!! Satin cartridges are rare as hen's teeth, but if any of you come across some, jump on them! There are likely MMs as well which, on the Sonus, will produce similar results. Ditto other vintage tonearm/cartridge combos. Have fun all!!!