Psychologist dissects Pink Floyd's 'Dark Side of the Moon'


I never get tired of learning more about this seminal work by one of my favorite artists of all time. 

 

 

128x12869zoso69

@jafant - You're welcome.  Dave said the master tapes for the original were burned up in the Universal fire.  He said he still liked the songs and still played them, so why not rerecord it.  I'm glad he did.

@barts 

Yeah.  I have the MoFi pressing for G**s sake.  Paid $50 years ago and now costing 10x that.

I listen to it nowanagain.  Overblown.  Do I enjoy it??  Not like a whole load of much better stuff.

They ain't the Beatles.  Nowhere near.

15 minutes of some of the sweetest stylings of Gilmore.  

Happy Friday you strange weird freaking people.

 

The Pink Floyd Band in all its forms and as Solo Artists make very listenable music, the collaborations that have been created with other performers/musicians are to the highest standards. All the above are totally to my tastes.

The Band Specialises when performing live as being and Entertainment Spectacle and are most likely in the Top Five Bands for this.

During recorded music replays, the words used for many songs can be overlooked as the composed music has quite a strong presence.

Once a Political viewpoint is picked up on from understanding the words in use, it doesn't have to be dwelled on. Does one think the entirety of all offering a creativity for the work undertaken to complete the Song and Music shared the Political View? I would say the surrounding team, were glad of their opportunity in front of them only. The end listener can easily adopt the same position, and make the most of the listening opportunity, without loading the experience with negatives about the words selected to be used by one person or a few people.  

Sure, Pink Floyd and Rush suck.

So do Bach and Mozart, they are so overplayed it's ridiculous...

...and spending $5000 on speaker cables makes music "better".

I'll be going back to my home planet now.