What Does It Take To Surpass A SME V?

@best-groove I get it, Just Like Linn never used the Ariston Design 🤔

The RB300 was a sale item in 1983, it was receiving rave reviews in 1983/84 and selling by the Shedload, taking away sales from other Brands who did not know how to get a lookin.

The SME V Debuted as a Prototype in 1984 andwas not a sale item, it was a shot across the bow to Rega showing the Market a Up Market Rega was in the making.

The explanation for the delay of the launch, was that supply chain materials were being tested.

The general consensus is the Rega was interrogated to the point a Lawsuit was not in the making. When the legal side was no longer a concern the SME V was launched in 1985.

SME got away with it and so followed the early upgrade options for the Rega from Third Party Suppliers, which evolved into more Rega Type Arms.

I am not disputing the amount of Brands with Rega Type Arms, much Joy and Pride f Ownership has been attained.

I am a SME IV user 'no more', who was wed to this arm for many years.

Also I am a Audiomods Series Five user 'no more', but could not really differentiate the IV and Series Five.

These arms are a design that from my evaluation are able to create a perception of constraint and a excess of control on a replay.

It is the perception of this control and how it has become repellent, no longer attractive that has been the motivation for me to make the change. 

As these designs are varied across the Brands, in the methodologies to produce them with serious considerations for the methods used to upgrade, it is off interest to me why there is so much of a muchness detected across the Arm Design in use.

A friend has been doing Freelance work for a Company that is producing Tonearms to compete with the Rega Design Arms and has had a option on all arms in the line, after having use of them on their Home System, they have not adopted one of these arms in place of their other Tonearm options, of which one is the design I use now.

In my simplistic world, I associate this with the Rega Design Effect.

@pindac Never written that Linn didn’t have an Ariston design, Linn started with Ariston turntables design; do you have a reliable source (magazine or other) to prove that the RB 300 was already produced in 1983?

Actually the RB300 was released in 1983, the first SME V prototype was shown at audio shows in 1984.

Given that both arm tubes are cast, requiring moulds to be developed, SME must have had the arm in development before the RB300 was released.

SME with the Companies inherent engineering prowess from the day, could identify and produce a mimic in days once a few designs with dimensions were on paper.

As Pattern Makers, Milling a Wand from any material to create a Part to be shown on a Prototype will have been a job for a apprentice.

@best-groove No need for me to supply anything, the Dates are the History and these are recorded very well.

A Search should even reveal that the RB 300 has a Gross of a estimated 400 000 sales, of which a substantial amount of sales were accumulated in 1983,84,85 (Shedloads)

As for Magazines, when SME were finally getting reviews of the launched V Tonearm in the Mid-Nineties, there is seemingly the usual influence from a Manufacturer, where the only reference to a Competitor Arm (RB300) is where the strengths are made known as improved on the competitor and how these are claimed to be better. No A/B Arm Comparisons allowed in any form of a Description.

The Idler Drive Community did that, and pretty much made it known the RB 300 was as a good a match as a SME V or IV when used with this Motor Drive.

Again interesting how Linn, with their TOTR Tonearm of this era, was a close mimic of a Swiss Brauer Arm.

Was the SME IV and later 309 produced as a cheaper V, to give a more affordable entry, or as a Model to tempt more customers away from Rega's continuing success in creating sales to SME?