2. misc-audio
  3. 180785-1209

What Gear Has Disappointed You?

While it's clearly not an absolute fact, we tend to have an expectation that a more expensive product should be better.  Within a given brand it really should be a fact, but because there's a wide range of factors in play when it comes to pricing it's not necessarily true when comparing different brands.  I think that it's fair to say that when we purchase a more expensive product we generally have an expectation that it'll perform better.  In the cases where our experience confirms this belief it can be the result of the product actually being better and/or some expectation bias. In a sense, it doesn't really matter which it is.

With this in mind, have you ever purchased a product expecting it to be superior only find that it was clearly inferior in your experience?

 

mceljo
richopp
760 posts
 

No particular order:

Crown Amps--shrill and broke quickly

Quad speakers--definition of "listening fatigue"

Mark Levinson anything (1970's)--really bad sound from awesome components

McIntosh anything--well, their scope thing is pretty cool to look at

Bose speakres--joke of the audio world with "direct reflecting."  Still laughing.

Stax headphones--1970's--SHRILL!

Dynaco 70--really noisy through headphones

Most box speakers

Trascriptor TT--BEAUTIFUL, but does not actually work

Lots more, but enough for now.

Cheers!

 

jl35
3,938 posts
 

if you really love the 70's gear curtdr , you should try some truly fully refurbished pieces...for most a huge difference, though a very vocal few prefer them original...

gavman's avatar
gavman
134 posts
 

Klipsch LaScala

Just criminal the complete absence of sub-bass. I was persuaded back to a dealer's home after he promised me epic bass. Put on my first record, some drum and bass, and the point where the bass slam usually descended into the mind boggling nether regions there was just a dry clap with no substance.

Pathetic

bigtwin's avatar
bigtwin
1,135 posts
 

@aolmrd1241 I'm not saying the Crescendo isn't a great speaker, if fact I loved it.  And the cabinet work (mine were burled walnut) is some of the best in the world.  My point was that moving from the Triton Reference to a speaker that was more than twice the price, was not justified by the improvment in sound quality.  Were they better?  Yes, not by that much.  But maybe they are the perfect speaker for your ears, in your listening space.  That's waht makes this an interesting pursuit. Cheers.

larsman's avatar
larsman
1,768 posts
 

@gavman - from what I've heard about big Klipsch speakers in reviews and such, their defining trait is most definitely NOT 'epic bass'. Tight bass, sure, but not wall-shaking. I think it was 'criminal' of the dealer to misrepresent the speaker if that is the case. Sounds like whatever you end up getting, you might get a lot out of adding a good subwoofer or two. 

More to discover