The Beatles Revolver


Just read where Giles Martin is using  AI-powered audio separation technology to remix Revolver. From what I read he can take the mono tracks and separate all the instruments and vocals on the 4 track tape the were recorded on and then I guess remix them in 24 track or whatever he wants. Is this good? I love The Beatles and no matter how much better it my sound it not the same. They had what they had in 1966. And George Martin did wonders with 4 tracks. Where does this reissuing of classic albums stop. Is Revolver remixed in multi tracks still Revolver?

128x128lenmc2964
Post removed 

To me it stinks of pandering to a generation that has limited attention span, doesn’t care about sound quality

I’m going to venture a guess that you haven’t heard any of these remixes or you wouldn’t make such ill-informed statements.

First, how is sitting down to listen to an album related to a limited attention span? Second, the sound quality is superb. It blows away any previous versions.

 

I'm so sick and tired of reading comments like "it's all about the money" as if there is something wrong with private enterprise. At the end of the day, that's how society develops and moves forward.

Is there really anything wrong with creating an income stream? Simple, if you don't like it, don't buy it, but allow others to decide for themselves.