Best CD between EMM Labs & DCS


Hi,

I'm living in France, so do not have the chance to heard EMM Labs because it's not imported.
I know well DCS to own a Delius & Purcell (no DSD) during few years
I've tested the new AudioaƩro Capitol Reference, which sound to tubey in my system.

Few questions about EMM Labs :

- are they as good as they seem to be ?
- How could you discribed their sound ?
- why no reviews on this product ?
- why so many people sale them used ? There is few DCS on a used market, but there is a lot of EMM Labs combo ?

The system I will put them is :
- Lamm M1.1 (the hybrid one) - which should be replaced by a Lamm Tube (ML1.1 or ML2.2)
- Kharma CRM 3.2 as speaker

Thanks

David
davidri
Cleopatra52,

Which EMM DAC & Transport are you using. Are they both Signature?
"Are they both Signature"

There is no sonic difference between a CDSD or the CDSD Signature. The software version however is what is important
Finally, I've bought first a DCS P8i - and sell it as soon as possible !!!!
It's so bad ! no music, only earing what's on the CD, but not music.

Then I've bought a CDSA eemlabs : really wonderfull ! It's music, you don't think about your sytem... only enjoy your sacd & redbook !
One interesting thing I read but i forget where is that upsampling CD players are better in different situations than non upsampling/oversampling CD players. But the same holds true in reverse for the alternate situation. What I find is that the EMM is excellent on modern CDs but reveals the shortfalls of older CDs. In that regard, the Zanden or others might be better. I hear the AMR can adjust this. That makes it a nice alternative for CD based systems where SACD is not important. I honestly believe once people hear SACD on the EMM they will not want to give it up.

I also spoke with people who find the DCS equipment warmer than the EMM. I find the reverse true. It might be a power cord difference. It might be more but in different systems different equipment will shine.