At33ptg II perfect straight out the box


Wow.
After my experience with the Goldring 1042 and its massive break in period and awful initial tonality I was thinking I was in for another slog of a break in period.
Well the At33ptg II sounds as good if not considerably better from the first minute than the fully broken in 1042.

Just thought I'd share the love.
Such a relaxed but thorough cartridge.
Nothing is missed and nothing is overdone.
Very pleased so far and it has only been 20 minutes.

Only using a project mm/mc little box n all. Not sure what the model is because when I search its name about five come up but it all sounds swell. 

Anyway can't wait to listen to all my records over and over.

The sound is crystal clear with no harshness at all and every instrument is exactly as it should be and there is plenty of sound stage for it all to sit in.

I understand what they mean about forgetting about the cartridge and just enjoying the music now.

Such a relief to not have to worry about what I need anymore!

On a side note. It is a much bigger improvement than 'upgrading' your amp. Though I really feel I couldn't get anything that would beat my JVC relic that is under £1k I have tried all the best reviewed under that. Note I listen at probably about talking volume I don't blast it.

The cart I had before by 1042 was a Lyra Helikon, with my pre amp I think it was coloured though and could sound just a touch on the cold side, very very scooped mids as well with my set up. The At33 is spot on. It seems warmer than the 1042 but I think it is really just because the 1042 could have a bit of a grating upper mids that would override the warmth of it.

My speakers are lowly wharfedale 10.1's which on comparison to my last speakers (q acoustics 2010i) are much better. Much flatter and wider response and they do take a lot to sound harsh in the treble, which I am very sensitive to.
Future upgrade will be speakers if I ever feel the need. Maybe Quad s2's. Their response looks a lot like the 10.1's but better. 

nedhogan
Like I posted I loved it right out of the box but after about 20 hours I switched to a Technics 7 gram headshell and put it on my SL-1800MKII TT.  I had it on a SL-1210 w/Jelco 750 arm.  It sounded a bit fuller after the change.
Vegasears do you think it works even better with a bit more mass?
Mine is on a medium mass TA. Nottingham Analogue Ace Space Deck. I had an extra 2 or 3g on my Goldring to try to get better performance in the lows but it probably made no difference.
I could put the weight back on for the AT?
I think the weight helped the Lyra too from memory, again might have just been it running in, it had been retipped.
I played with mass a bit and also declination/VTA, AT cartridges like the arm to be tail up about 26 degrees.  I used the 33 with two different arms: Jolida 750 9" on an SL-1210 and a SL-1800MKII stock.  The 33 seems to perform slightly better with the lighter arm on the 1800 for me. Note: over the years it's been my habit to keep the counterweight fairly close to pivot point of the arm.

New AT33ptgII on a 1200G headshell going through a new Hagerman Trumpet MC sounds amazing. I’m coming from AT740ml/AT750sh and it’s a very noticeable step up. I can only imagine how it will sound when everything settles down.

Really happy as the AT33ptgII was very noisy with my Project RS Phono Box RS and sat in a drawer for a year.

The Hagerman has a wall wart but uses a novel circuit design to mitigate hum. The Phono Box RS had an outboard PS and was very hummy when using MC gains.

 

Set up my PTG/II  less than 2 weeks ago (Heybrook TT2/LVX); you're right, break in is almost nonexistent.

Been using AT MC's for 30+ years, specifically OC9 and OC9ML.. These carts required 10-20 hours to break in, and overall sound is a bit leaner than the PTG/II and also a slightly more analytical.

Prefer the OC9's on live rock LPs but the PTG/II on just about everything else.

Despite the PTG/II being rated at .3 mV and the OC9's at .4 mV, output through my NAK CA-7A pre-amp appears to be almost identical.