Article: "Spin Me Round: Why Vinyl is Better Than Digital"


Article: "Spin Me Round: Why Vinyl is Better Than Digital"

I am sharing this for those with an interest. I no longer have vinyl, but I find the issues involved in the debates to be interesting. This piece raises interesting issues and relates them to philosophy, which I know is not everyone's bag. So, you've been warned. I think the philosophical ideas here are pretty well explained -- this is not a journal article. I'm not advocating these ideas, and am not staked in the issues -- so I won't be debating things here. But it's fodder for anyone with an interest, I think. So, discuss away!

https://aestheticsforbirds.com/2019/11/25/spin-me-round-why-vinyl-is-better-than-digital/amp/?fbclid...
128x128hilde45
If you are going to make stuff up to suit your view of the world,
When i said that they are on par, i was not speaking about the technological possiblities, but of their different qualities contributing to the perceived phenomenon...

You also make stuff up to suit your technological view of the world...

I only say from the beginning that analog is not superior to digital in audio design, but i oppose the affirmation that all there is in sound is captured only and completely by digital cooking recipe....The brain is NOT a digital computer and the ears are not an analog mechanical engine....
in my experience, digital was the best thing that could happen to us working-class types that previously could only barely afford crappy entry-level analog whose welter of blatant distortions both ruins the software [records] as well as irritates the ears of all listeners within earshot. cheap digital sounds glarey and borderline harsh but at least there is no inner groove distortion, mistracking on challenging passages, poor pressings with molded-in distortion, crackle and hiss and groove roar and rumble. 
That was fun (the slices of bread analogy). I should qualify it as being an explanation given to me back in the mid-late 80's. My first digital player was of the single laser type. The sound was horrible. In addition, early CDs were digitized copies of LPs. I still have some where the jewel box art was a picture of an album cover, complete with ringwear! You could even hear a few pops and clicks from the vinyl they were copied from. We've come a long way baby. If the instrument isn't live in your ear, all reproduced sounds differ in some way from the original source. I'm going back to my sourdough toast now, "different strokes for different folks" (Sly Stone). AB
The reason vinyl sounds better is the instrument timbre and the interaction of them. There is no electronic tool for measuring this. Regardless of the format, albums recorded with instruments played separately have a similar problem - lacking vitality and authenticity bc those of us used to live performance miss these musical interactions. Modern digital sampling helps (often with better mastering and mixing) a lot but compared to old digital sampling vinyl is astounding - there is zero contest.

Direct stream w/ SB2 vs RPM3 with EVO III through a gold note PH-10 > my DAC is theoretically better than the phono including better cables.
For me to compare vynil vs digital it will never end, But with a train good ears and who knows music for the most part they will prefer vynil.The soul of music of vynil it’s hard to accomplish on digital. Again I love both format , that’s why I have both.