2. misc-audio
  3. 152899-117374

Has to be said

Hi,
i been reading most sites and the little arguments about this and that about making audio in this case be more pleasent ot better to any individual. and have to say upfront that if "you" believe its better to you than it is in fact true to you and you only. we are just reletive respondants to each other and therefore nature and the universe.
many of the subjects that come up as to improving ones audio system tend to go into little details that may or may not have "real" affects on most of us. and also be provable with phsics,math,medical studies etc.many musicians and many humans can distinguish alot of these aspects. and they are ALL quantifiable and measureable very easilly. from 1800 till today FFT and resonance,sound perfiliration has been well adjustable from the totally acoustic pipe organs to the music halls 100s of years ago with out electronic fixes, and all these new snake oil gagets on the market. many are always big commenters here on this site.
Its totally true you can "fix" and sound wave with free rocks,walls,chambers, etc. so go for it at a cost of zero dollars. and adbandon all these marketing hacks.
Ive been well into sound,RF,Radioation, Electron manulipation, Audio,phsics etc all my life and all my relatives aslso . I dont need to justify my opinions yet am dignified by holding 8 international patents,2 doctrets and my dad with similar fields.
one crazy obvious thing no one even bothers to mention is the way off standard of 440hz shifted 8hz the earths standard resonance. while all the 1000s of years 432hz was based on real natural happenings before electronics. dont you all care everything you listen to is 8hz off tune and therefore wrong, but you will bicker about a few microvolts noise from an ocslittating wire with parallell wire  hanging off a standoff. itf too funny to me.
yes all digital except one source tunes their DAC math to 435hz to be more correct to Verdi and other great composers.
ive got tuning forks over the audio and above spectrum and tune my panios violins etc to them 432 hz
and need to say again. yes please do everything Analoge
to correct your sound system, its been done in churches,music halls,the great pyrmids, with instruments themselves.
but do not chase the rabbit down the money hole to fix apparent physhoacoustics in your listening area.

ps the spelling and writing is horrid cause ive got a brain injury2 years ago and under go EEG,ehthesographs and neuro studies constantly. where various frequency sweeps are put thru me and studied by the medical and commercial fields.
Im off for now to play my bass thru 50000watts total. and resonate the neighborhood at 8.2 HZ....

128x128hemigreg
hemigreg's avatar
hemigreg OP
119 posts
 
please get your wife on as an expert. advisor thats the kind of real knowlege this place needs.    and I am not or ever was claiming better/worse,    or medical hurt by wrong tuning---all just point out the huge disparity in the many degrees of separation disparity from changing things in an audio system. Ie fuse direction, wire breakin etc.
I can write pages at a whim, i used to write Govt JAN/MIL standards and there can be 60 pages for a 8-32 philips screw....LOL
I gots all day/night to just banter. i dont sleep much..with ptsd.

anyhow back to post #1    and ppplease some musiciaans chime in here.
falco is whifes phips and bird rack calibrated to the auditory recpetors under the scalp. mine had to be altered from the titanium plate thats now there. the repolarizing NA in the diffusion zone is tricky.
she can help me with a comming patent which may alter the mu receptors in opiate addiction with phased signals making the brain resonate like in a humming montra sound...  all injected with 4 probes and 2 earbuds... no anything like binerual depression effects.
well you got me started on something more. so feel free to e mail me at anytime hemigreg@aol.com   its in conjunction with a local addiction/neuralogist Dr Surosky of glencove addiction center.
atdavid
736 posts
 
Cleeds, nothink, rodman, even GK, all playing from the same anti-science playbook, attack the poster, not the post. Why? Because you can’t. You can’t because you don’t even understand the posts. You just ra-ra around anything that says what you want to believe because it makes you feel safe. I would love to see you try to actually refute the content of my posts. I could use the laugh!

It is just downright pathetic that you need to claim that anyone more knowledgeable than you must be quoting Wikipedia (and yet you can't show where I have quoted Wikipedia ... and the odd time I do, I will say that I am).
atdavid
736 posts
 
GK Kenworth sized holes:
  • Virtually no visible light in the IR laser in a CD player.
  • The detector is a focused assembly. That means that "scattered" light predominantly does not reach the detector as it is off-angle and outside the field of view.
  • The interior of the optical receptor is non-reflective to prevent "scattered" light from reaching the photo receptor.
  • The receptor has an IR pass filter so that visible light is greatly attenuated.
  • The optical assembly is simple and optimized for 780nm, so visible will be less focused.
  • The error rates for CD are well known and there is a specific standard for production. The first level errors except for a significantly damaged disk are easily fixed with error correction codes, essentially redundant data.  Unfixable C2 errors on a production CD are typically 0. That means that when you open up that CD, you are going to get perfect data.
  • There are many tools available that are very inexpensive that can show C1, C2 and unfixable C2 errors. That means you could easily prove your product has any audible benefit by showing it reduces unfixable C2 errors.
  • Jitter measurement is easy. If your product works, you could show how it reduces jitter.
  • We have 50X and higher CD readers that manage to work. The 1X of audio .... is exceedingly simple.
  • High quality players will reclock the data to eliminate jitter and anything your claimed products will do.


hemigreg's avatar
hemigreg OP
119 posts
 
continued from previous
mine had to be altered from the titanium plate thats now there. the repolarizing NA in the diffusion zone is tricky.
I rebuilt a 32 ch network analyzer added 1meg:1 gain op amps differential inputs. 16 +/_ chs.this can sense the repolarization of the Na and Ca charge from eack nerve pulse-to put it bascic.  the balance at fing the virtual zero is hard though. but it allows mt to quantify 16 different cross sections and effects of subconcious  and cons inputs. also plotting the ELF freqs of restful brain like a few HZ   yea we all love low bsss notes thats why ive done this since the 70 at Govt companies for military "mind control" evel went on LSD snd sleep tests at mit and new york institute of tech and its quack ciro school.     the writing is messed up by my brain injury and induced parkinscisom. ive tried to build new neurotransmitters but doesent work too well so sometimes i go to voice recongitonn typing.
Ive got published works in the materials science review like 1998. presented in Boston. 
michaelgreenaudio's avatar
michaelgreenaudio
1,019 posts
 

"Well, how does one bring it into tune??"

you tune it

"everything affects everything else" mg

you guys should try doing stuff once in a while :)

For those who have already converted to Low Mass Tunable systems, you’re so far ahead of the curve it does make these threads a little odd if not hilarious.

http://www.michaelgreenaudio.net/


More to discover