Audio hobby is like tasting wine.


1. There is no best wine for everyone.

It depends on personal taste to choose favorite wine.


2. Law of diminishing return apply to both audio and wine.

100$ wine is not 10 times better than 10$ wine.

1,000$ wine is not 10 times better than 100$ wine.


3. You need experience to acknowledge good audio or wine.

I am not wine connoisseur.

But I could taste some nice wines through one of my rich friend who is willing to treat nice wines in his listening room.

He treated 700$ wine to me last year. It is the best wine I had ever tasted.

I had never bought wine more than 150$ myself, since I do not have confidence in selecting right one.

Some rich guy paid huge price for big audio system.

It plays loud but not in the balanced way or without any nuanced flavor of nice wines.

Money can not buy you nice system.

You need experience to match right components and cables.


4. One keeps looking for different flavor.

Most people do not want to drink same wine everyday.

They wish to taste different flavor.

Audiophile is looking for new flavor in their audio system.

They keep changing components every year or do some tweaks like cable rolling, tube rolling and power isolation.

Sometimes audiophile do sidegrade rather than upgrade.


I have my first serious audio system back to 1978 with ADS bookself speaker, Garrard Turntable and Fisher integrated amplifier.

After using dynamic speakers like Altech, Thiel and Canton, I was enamored by Apogee Duetta ribbon speaker and Martin Logan CLX full range electrostatic speaker around 1989.

I do not have enough listening space or money to buy two of them at the same time.

Although I loved silky violin tone out of Martin Logan, I chose Apogee based upon overall balance and seemless dynamics.

I had been happy with Apogee Duetta Sig driven by Krell KSA 150 from 1989 to 1999.

But I wish to get sub bass below 35 hz.

It is not easy to match subwoofer with Apogee Duetta Sig which is very fast.

Thus I had switched to Avalon Ascent II and then to Wilson Watt Puppy 4 and then B&W Notilus 801.


B&W Notilus 801(15 inch woofer) driven by Jadis 500(350 watts tube power) gave the most powerful and deep bass in my listening room.

But with too much heat and some tube popping out, I had swtiched to 300B SET amp with 8 watts from the recommendation of my friend who treated me 700$ wine.

I also replaced B&W Notilus 801 with full range high efficiency speaker.

Full range speaker is not my cup of tea with limited dynamics and bass extension.

Thus I had auditioned few speakers to replace full range.

It came down to Lansche 4.1 and JBL DD66000.

Although I liked enormous dynamics out of JBL, it may need more power than 8watts of Silbatone.SET.

Thus I had chosen Lansche on 2007 and been happy with its pristine treble out of plasma tweeter.


Last December, I came across Vintage Western horn full system which cost 300K$.

I really like its natural dynamics and timber out of it.

But I could not shell out 300K$ right now.

This year I had embarked upon earphones and headphones.

I need those listening to music when my wife is sleeping or I travel out of town.


I had lot of joy in Stax 009S driven by Carbon amp with nuanced details and wide and deep headstage.


Although I loved Martin Logan CLX sound, I had never had electrostatic speaker at home.

Now I enjoy Stax 009s instead.


I also had considered getting ribbon or planar speaker but will opt for ribbon headphone instead.

It is called Raal Sr1a which I auditioned last week.

It reminds me of Apogee Duetta with fast and open sound.

I expect to get it January next year.


Some people place more than two sets of speakers in one room.

But I do not like such placement since sound of speaker is very sensitive to room acoustics.

But it is easier to have several headphones and choose them upon mood without paying attention to room acoustics or space.


For the time being I will play with several headphones with various flavors.
128x128shkong78
I think that many of the fans of vintage equipment believe that this gear holds its value because it sounds as good as modern equipment. This is rarely the case without upgrades. Nostalgia plays a big part. 

Frank dont you dare remove your post. Good on you!
jsautter ...

Thank you. :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On vintage equipment. I used to have a love affair with the vintage stuff. Modified Dynaco Stereo 70s bridged as mono amps, modified Dynaco Pas-3, Acustat IIIs. Grado cartridges.  Sounded great at the time, but not like the present gear that's available today. Wouldn't mind a pair of Marantz 9s to play with though.

Frank


I really like your analogy and have thought the same thing myself.  Taste is obviously subjective and taste changes over time.  And similar to this forum i have seen grown men argue over the merits of the wine they liked the most.

This post also makes me happy because it reminds me thanksgiving is next week and i will get the chance to drink really good wine all day!
Oregonpapa 11-20-2019
Wouldn’t mind a pair of Marantz 9s to play with though.
During the early to mid-1990s I owned several of the classic Marantz tube components, including a pair of 9s, as well as a pair of Model 1 mono preamps, a pair of Model 2 monoblock amps, a Model 7 preamp, and two different 10B tuners.

The 9s were nice sounding, but not particularly special in any way. And while I suppose it is possible that condition was a factor in that, I did perform routine minor maintenance on each of these pieces, such as testing tubes on a good quality Hickok tube tester and replacing them as necessary, spraying contact cleaner into controls and switches, and powering each piece up for the first time very slowly (i.e., over the course of several hours or more) using a variable AC power supply.

My sonic favorite among all of these models, by far, were the Model 2 mono amps, used in triode mode. They had a richness to the sound that seemed just right to me, i.e., not overdone. (The 9s were leaner in comparison). The 18 or 20 watts or so which the 2s could provide in that mode were not enough for my purposes, though, with the 90 db speakers I had at the time and when playing classical symphonic recordings having particularly wide dynamic range. (At one point a Telarc bass drum beat even caused a bright arc in the power tubes). So I eventually sold them, although I felt a sense of loss for a long time afterward.

Today I believe a pair of 2s in good condition would go for somewhere between $10K and $15K, around 5x what I sold them for back then. And of course a pair of 9s in good condition would go for a good deal more than that.

Best regards,
-- Al

@millercarbon Appreciating in value with age is not what I meant.  Wines, those intended for aging at least, also improve in quality and drinkability sometimes vastly. Break in aside audio components don't typically improve soundwise with age.