Having a vested interest in the music of my generation ('70 Rock) I was more than a little dismayed seeing so many bands that I had either seen in concert or had at least one album./cd of. I am a little curious how everyone is gauging 'worst band'. What is the benchmark that you are using? Having never recorded a decent song in their entire career, fron first to last? Having only one listenable song per album, two maybe?
While I do take exception to a lot of the name put forth as if I like one or several of their songs I would be hard pressed to call them the worse. There are a lot names that if I did not hear a single track for the next twenty years I would consider myself fortunate. All bands, no matter how sucessful tend to go off the rails at some point. I doubt that many can say they love every track of every ablum that a specific band recorded over their career. Equally, I doubt that a band you might have liked and wnet to go see blew the live event. I doin't know about everyone else, but I have my good and bad days. I think it is human thing....
While I do take exception to a lot of the name put forth as if I like one or several of their songs I would be hard pressed to call them the worse. There are a lot names that if I did not hear a single track for the next twenty years I would consider myself fortunate. All bands, no matter how sucessful tend to go off the rails at some point. I doubt that many can say they love every track of every ablum that a specific band recorded over their career. Equally, I doubt that a band you might have liked and wnet to go see blew the live event. I doin't know about everyone else, but I have my good and bad days. I think it is human thing....