Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
jafant
Subwoofers are inherently expensive, especially at Vandy / Thiel levels of execution.

Hypothesis: The ear-brain builds its sonic interpretation from the bottom up. It infers harmonic structure and actually creates a 'phantom fundamental' if none is present in the reproduced waveform. My opinion is that the listener can be better off creating his own phantom fundamental than interpolating a scrambled waveform.

But the choices are never that simple. It's always some mixed bag.
Enter amp interaction. As mentioned above, the amp can be drained and strained by deep bass demands, especially into Thielesque low impedance loads, especially as in the CS5. An obvious remedy is bi-amping' where one channel drives the bass and the other the highs.

Thiel stepped away from the bi solution for various reasons, among which was over-all system cost-effectiveness. The customer buys 2 amps. Another was amp and/or cable mix and match - there are many ways to screw up the sound and the almost-adept-enough dealer / audiophile is skilled at doing so. We determined that the straight-forward, vastly more safe, simple and less expensive route of single inputs was the best way forward, especially given Thiel's high performance per price niche.

At this time I am exploring various bi options while providing a high-quality single input option of jumper straps of solid high purity copper with conductive grease.
Just a note to point out that if you like 3.5's otherwise, four or five of them in a room eliminates any need for a sub while anything resembling recommended surround placement generally also eliminates bass room nodes.
Not sure if serial numbers for all Thiel models are of interest here, but I have the following pairs:  CS 2 2s: 7599,7600 and 3.7s 131,132. I am the original owner of the 2 2s and (probably) the third owner of the 3.7s.
At one show before the advent of surround, we positioned 2 pairs of 3.5s in the normal stereo position - back to back. There was about 5' between the back-firing pair and the wall and plenty of side wall space as well. The effect is magnificent. The bass wave forms a quasi spherical wave front and the transition to upper frequency in-fill is seamless. If you like bi-polar presentation, try it. That's if you have a spare pair of 3.5s, or your main speaker of choice, available.