Bryston is bulletproof. This does not matter until the unexpected happens. But at that point ...
Used Bryston 3B-ST or Schiit Vidar?
On the surface, these would seem like similar amps. Used prices of a Bryston 3B-ST are now comparable to a new Schiit Vidar. They have roughly the same power output and both have been praised for their neutral balance, dynamics, and bass control. Both have been criticized for maybe not being the last word in treble refinement. But they are very different designs, so presumably there are some sonic differences.
Does anyone have experience with both?
Does anyone have experience with both?
- ...
- 7 posts total
aalden 22years old v new with also latest surface mount components, you have a hard choice, myself knowing a little of the topology of both my money would go on the Vidar. Both should be able to drive your Thiel 1.5’s impedance load, as it’s basically benign 3-4ohm resistive. https://www.stereophile.com/images/TCS15fig1.jpg Cheers George |
Bryston is known for the long warranty, but schitt is longer than some at 5 yrs. The limited experience I had with bryston power was just demos and also owning a b60 integrated years ago. Long story short, I liked it’s preamp section better than its power section. I do currently own a Vidar and posted my impression of it in the Vidar thread. Just guessing and it’s only a guess, bryston would be "cleaner" and soundstage wider but somewhat shallow. Vidar would have less stage width, but better depth, equal or better bass, somewhat less detail but better instrument tone. Lastly the Bryston would be quieter (i.e. hum and noise). Generally in comparing direct coupled amps that have no servos or caps in the signal path to ones that do, there is a better timbre of instruments on the direct coupled designs. |
- 7 posts total