martin logan prodigy vs sound lab m-2


i have had every sound lab under the sun and two pair of logans. cls 2s and quest zs. the sound labs always killed the logans in my book, but ml has just built a nice line of speakers. i like the prodigys but still think the labs win. what does everyone else think and why?
128x128kirk930
Duke, nothing to apologize for. BTW, your posts always make me drool for a Sound Lab. If I could only place them within 2.5 feet of rear wall (and had the cash, LOL), I'd grab a pair tomorrow.
Duke it's kewl. We can all relate to writing about gear we're passionate about.

I second Jeffkad, and personally if I could afford SL's I'd likely not be living with ML's. Nothing against my CLS', but we know it's not a true full range ESL. But w/a sub it's not a bad poor man's setup.
Duke should never apologize . I am back in 2011 with ml prodigys and tube research gt 400 monos. I also have krell 650m monos. I just owned a pair of m1s with the px mylar. Still awsome speakers but i live In south florida and have no room for them. I have a 133 inch screen in between the mls. They sound awsome. You guys are always welcome for a listen. Tube research by the way makes everything else sound broken. I think dukes response in 01 was great.
2015 and Here we go again. I have owned the Ml Monolith 3s now for the past couple of years. They have the outboard covers and i am pretty sure these are the ones that were built for the statement owners. I must say they have really Impressed me with the huge soundstage and 3d sound. I had prodigies before them and i must say they went backwards. Kind of funny how the new 80k speaker looks like a new Monolith . Any way i am thinking about trying sound labs again. Doubt i will ever part with the Monolith 3 though. Three systems here i go. Anyone want to sell some U2s?