What is better ML, Krell or Classe

As it turns out, I've had the chance to compare Classe 401, ML 336, and Krell FPB300 in the last two months. If you're looking for the smooth midrange, ML is the one. Classe didn't seem to have the imaging depth (I've found this to be true for all Classe stuff when compared to higher-grade amps). I have to disagree with Lev335 regarding the slam factor though. While the ML had reasonable slam, it was simply not the equal of the Krell in that department. By comparison, I found the ML "soft-sounding" even though it had more power (350@8 vs. 300) and a true dual-mono architecture. I would also say in general that the Krell's "lack of refinement" is overstated. Not quite as refined as the ML in the mids and highs, but to suggest it has none at all is simply not true. Good luck!

What about Plinius? You should try the SA-250.

Lev335 I am using Apogee Stage.

Once you hear the Lamm ML1s, you will sell all of you ML, Krell, etc. I have owned them all- I have the 33H in the garage still in the orig packaging, will open and compare this Sat- but doubtful it will be as good as the Lamms.

A4s4, I thought about the Lamms but I wanted a little more power on tap and thought the price of admission was too steep. Please post your findings on how they compare.
Thanks!