Have U ever bought an LP because of the cover art?

I've bought some of the early classical recordings on RCA, Capitol, etc., just for the cover art. I love abstract art, and these really fit the bill. I've played the music inside the covers of course, and enjoy that as well. Some of these covers deserve framing and placing on the wall.

Almost always. Good cover art, in my opinion, suggests that care was taken in all aspects of production. Not always true, but a good barometer. There are, of course, exceptions. I remember picking up "Stealing Fire" by Bruce Cockburn and putting it back a dozen times because the cover art was so bad. I'm glad I eventually got over it. Great, great album.
With classical, I have this prejudice against albums whose cover art features the conductor or soloist looking sexy. Covers that feature the composer or the piece in question (i.e. a pastoral scene for Beethoven's 6th) are much more likely to get my money. As much as I like to look at Hilary Hahn (or Maxim Vengerov for you ladies out there), when I am in the serious process of choosing music, sex appeal has no place.
Am I in the minority here, or are the marketing folk that clueless?

Cheers.

P.S. Records made on a shoestring budget, of course, get an exemption. But Deutsche Gramophon's hot new release or a new album by Green Day have the resources to do it well from start to finish, including cover art.

Ohio Players-the image of the knife in the back is forever inscribed in my brain.

Since this thread seems to have continuing life, how about the original mono cover for the RCA issue of Berlioz's Symphonie Fantastique? As used in the Classic Records stereo reissue:

Before Mary Tyler Moore hit it big on the Dick Van Dyke Show, her career also included modeling. I have an autographed copy of a late fifties "easy listening" lp featuring her mucho pretty face which I picked up recently on eBay.