Zu Presence vs. Devore Nines

I did not listen to the Zu Presence. However, I definitely preferred the Zu Definitions that I have at home to the Devore Nines that I heard in the shop.

One difference between the Zu and Devore is that one is upfront and the other is more laid back. Zu projects more of the stage in front of the speakers while Devore has a behind the speakers stage. Also the tweeter in the Devore is more forgiving lets say sweeter sounding. This is all personal preference as Tvad said and listening yourself is always the best. Myself I had the Devore Reference Silverbacks and the Zu Defination Mk 1.9 in my system at the same time and I now have the Silverbacks. I think the Devore also have more WAF based on looks but the Zu will be the easier load to drive.

Agree that you should listen if possible, especially since these speakers are both more idiosyncratic than many other speakers.

From my experience, Zus excel at dynamic contrasts, & quick transient changes. I agree w/comment that they present a soundstage projected mostly between and somewhat in front of the speakers. The mate well with low powered SETs, etc.

Devore Nines also are easy to drive. They are probably nice in smaller rooms, present a deeper stage, and more distant perspective with sounds between & behind the speaker plane. They have a full-bodied midrange and a natural delicacy with acoustic guitar, voice and piano. For me, they struggled to move much air when presented with dynamic orchestral music, and ultimately left me feeling that something was missing when playing "big music". If I listened mostly to jazz trios & singer/songwriters & had a small space, they might be ideal.

Overall, they are so different, you need to hear them! Cheers,
Spencer

nice system...with 8 watts though, you're being a little too optimistic about the devore. your AN J's are perfect for your amp. If you're looking for deeper bass, putting the J's in corners will help....otherwise give the zu's a shot.