Would MA5300 Integrated be Worthwhile Upgrade


I currently have a Marantz SR 7008 AVR where I'm using the preouts along with a Rotel 1582 II.  Speakers are Martin Logan Motion 40's.  I am also using a Martin Logan Sub with this setup. This system sounds pretty good.  Many commentators criticize the sound of AVRs but the preamp section of the Marantz provides good detail and separation and seem to process the digital signals from my Sonos Connect fairly well. The Rotel has 200 WPC which drive Motion 40's well.  Because my room sucks I have the speakers set to "small" on the AVR and having to use a high cross-over pushing more of the bass to the Sub.  If I run the speakers on large without the sub,  the bass is boomy and sounds terrible.  I've always dreamed of owing a Mcintosh amp and wonder what I'm missing.  I heard the MA5300 at Magnolia playing with the Motion 40's.  It sounded really sweet, the soundstage was unbelievable.  However it's very hard to tell if its Magnolia's acoustically perfect room that made the combo sound so sweet or if it was the McIntosh.  The Mc is $5,000 and only 100 wpc and my Rotel Amp is 200 wpc.  Is it possible for the lower watt Mc to outperform my current setup all else being equal.  Am I likely to have a noticeable improvements ?  Also I never owned an integrated and wonder if there is a setting to run the front speakers as small for use with the Sub?  Thoughts appreciated.
128x128ppack
That Mac Integrated does not have the output transformers which gives you the McIntosh house sound.  
Thanks.  I thought the output transformers were related to speaker impedance matching.  This unit is labelled on the back for 4 and 8 ohms into a single connection.  I'm sure this was a compromise to keep the unit smaller (which is a good thing). I guess this makes the unit less desirable from a resale perspective, but what does it have to do with creating the McIntosh "house" sound?
Instead of an integrated, why not buy a Mac Power amp and scrap the Rotel.  Big difference.  That way you can keep using all of the features of the Marantz.
For the wattage, 100 watts to 200 is only 3 db.  Also, I would guess that the Mac's dynamic headroom will make up some of this difference.  Look at the weight and size of the power supplies.  There are plenty of 20 watt amps that sound better than less expensive 200 watt amps.  Go look at the specs of a Pass Labs or Jeff Rowland.
@ppack...…………………………..

The quality of the output transformers is what makes the McIntosh house sound.  The electricity passing through the transformers gives the classic sound.  That integrated is their entry level amp.  Originally I was going to buy the 5200 when it first came out but after talking to the people at Audio Classics, I purchased a used MA6600 200wpc integrated with the output transformers.  Big difference in the sound.  Through the transformers, there is a much richer midrange.
Just bought a Cambridge Audio 851N streamer/DAC and connected directly to my Rotel power amp.   The sound quality is superb compared to the Sonos connect and I took the receiver out of the chain. System starting to sound high end with this configuration. Only problem no tone controls and I need to tame the bass a little in my room. Question if I push a analog signal out of the 851through the Marantz receiver analog input to use bass /treble would the signal get digitally processed again. I’d be using the preamp outs on the Marantz to the Rotel power amp. Is the tone control on Marantz receiver done through DSP or analog?  I don’t want to mess up the quality of the 851 processing with additional processing from Marantz.