Wilson Audio Watt Puppy 7 vs. Kharma 3.2


I'm very undecided, since I have not heard the Kharma speakers. Heard very nice things about them both. I'm looking for anyone who has heard both speakers and can comment on both. When commenting on the 3.2 please specify which model. Thank you.
imt8t

Showing 1 response by jtinn

Extemely different speakers. Maybe even opposite ends of the spectrum.

Here goes:

Wilson WP 7: Very dynamic, detailed and good depth in bass. With proper setup and amplification, good imaging, soundstaging and sense of space. Can sound mechanical, bloated and slightly etched. Musicality is something you have to really work for.

Kharma 3.2 FE: Excellent coherence, inner detail, imaging and soundstaging. You should expect as much from a two way speaker. Good musicality although sometime a bit dry and lean. Depth of bass and dynamism is definitely it's weakness. Adding a subwoofer hurts coherence and does not add dynamism, only adds to depth.

I would say that depending on room size, musical tastes and accompanied equipment would make a suggestion on my part easier.