Please illuminate me
Simple answer: That's Higher End
*Sad* Personally I feel discriminated with a 1 motor Design.
Why three motors?
Can someone enlighten me on the wisdom of having a three motor turntable like the TW Acustic with only ONE side of the belt touching the platter?
Here is an example.
I just don't get it...
Showing 2 responses by syntax
Gents, let me explain,this is a very compex response so read carefully. Dear Downunder, thank you very much for your insight and warning. It is indeed VERY complex, I read it carefully AND very s-l-o-w-l-y. Probably that Pic from the Raven is an old one, guess Raven Mk 33.3, you see it, that the belt is stretched. The later generation has one with higher specs (but I am not sure). But it saves the owner some money, he pulls away the motors and can use it some more time. Great. This German knows what the Audiophile needs. When I realized the striking idea and empirical research behind it, I was stunned in awe... Yes, never too old to learn from a real Master. Some time ago I made comparisons with Belts, I got some very interesting results, but when I see this fascinating solution, I think, I missed the target by a mile. Belt Comparison ... is already desperately looking for 2 more Micro Seiki RY5500 motor drives to finally enter Nirvana. Problem is, those motors are too large to fit in the spaces between his armbases and the rack is too small too. Well, well, here you see my experiment for the sonical Nirwana. |