Why the limit on warranty to subsequent purchasor?


I have been looking into picking up a used high end CD player but I am finding that warranties are not transferrable from the original owner? I don't understand this. Maybe on a $500 unit, but a $5000 unit with no transferrable warranty, it makes me want to run from that manufacturer.
sm121055

Kevziek - a disgusting display of ultimate capitalism? I believe that as a consumer we all have the freedom of choise to pick and choose what we buy. If we don't like the Company's policy, we are free to buy from someone else. The basic premise of business is to make a profit for the owners. There is absolutely nothing disgusting about this. If anyone is that offended by the policy they should vote with their wallets and buy from a company whose policies they like.

Sincerely, Scott - libertarian and proud ultimate capitalist. Caveat emptor!
The consumer who pays nearly retail, if not full retail is the only one who makes any money for the company. The manufacturer is not responsible to the second or third buyer since thay obviously have no relationship.
Companies who go above and beyond this 'origional buyer' warranty are taking a big risk. Most damage to equipment occurs when it is being moved, so second or third owner of a piece are a much higher risk than the one customer who actually paid them anything.
It would be fiscally dangerous to warranty everything after it has changed hands a few times. I'm not sure, but I would guess this business is risky enough the way it is, who wants to take additional risks???
Those Manufacturers are greedy and want you to buy directly from them,if you want piece of mind.
I understand some of the reasoning but as you start increasing the price, other industries allow transferring the warranty. The transfering of the warranty allows people to try a product at a price they can afford. Can you imagine buying a 1 year old Corvette and Chevy says sorry, you have no warranty on that engine. This helps a manufacturer to develop brand loyalty and when the individual can affort to buy new, that brand is on the top of the list.
If I bought a Krell KAV piece with a transferrable warranty, I'd consider the warranty to be an integral part of the purchase. Now that Krell (and others) have "retroactively" dropped their transferrable warranty, I do believe someone will eventually sue over this.
This hobby is like our little private world. This is our version of politics......

It's Miller Time!