Why the huge increase in the price of Sonus Farber Amanti G5 speakers.


Just the other day, the G5’s were $36k and now they’re $43k!  I’m thinking it’s too soon for it to be tariffs.  Is Sonus Farber selling so many pairs that they’re just getting greedy?  Whatever the reason, an almost 20% price increase can’t be good for business.

 

curiousjim

@faustuss yes  very true. He knows what he is talking about, while other are mostly guessing. 

Unless you are about to buy a Sonus Faber loudspeaker, then why do you even care what the MSRP is?  How does it effect you?  While I found this thread interesting I really don't care what a Sonus Faber loudspeaker costs.  My interest in the thread was piqued by the vitriol and quasi-conspiracy undertones of some of the comments.  Plus there were several comments about better loudspeakers at much lower prices.  I wish they had named those loudspeakers.

Anybody know the prices of the new Rolex lineup?  I haven't worn a watch in 35 years and plan to die that way, but I think I can muster some faux outrage on the subject.

@gano 

yes  very true. He knows what he is talking about, while other are mostly guessing. 

Actually, there are quite a few on these forums who know what he's talking about. Sales and Operations Planning is not a novel concept. However, corporate history tells us that, despite all the savvy people analyzing the markets, gathering important data, going through an elaborate decision making process, etc., many companies still managed to go out of business due to the boneheaded or shortsighted decisions made by their leadership in these very meetings. Otherwise, Blockbuster, Radio Shack, Kodak, ToysRUs, Enron, etc. would still be kicking ass, no? 

@gano I was responding to you about assuming that only he knows what he’s talking about while others are just guessing. What he described is a typical process in business called sales and operations planning or integrated business planning. It’s standard fare in the business world. Lots of people on this forum are quite familiar with how that works :)

His rebuttal to @1971gto455ho was that he was being cynical because a lot of very smart and savvy people sit in important meetings making important decisions like this, so how can they be wrong. I’m just saying that it is not necessarily a slam dunk as evident by so many once-successful corporations that failed despite all the brilliant leadership. Now, I’m not suggesting that SF will necessarily fail due to this, but it is not being ’cynical’ to question their strategy or motives.