Most observation of details is a bad sign...
Why?
Because in a real experience of natural sound our attention is immersed in a natural way and not alerted by "something" out of balance from the tonal physionomy.
In front of beauty we dont ask for details and we dont focus on details...
We dont set a speakers/room for more "details" but for more naturalness and balance...
In my opinion this vocabulary insisting about "details" in reviewers articles follows from their focus on the gear design for itself not from acoustic concrete understanding in a specific speakers/room...
It is there in their discourse, not only to express their variable impressions about gear but to sell it...
I dont buy gear i try to implement it acoustically in the right way...
Customers want a reason to buy something new : "more details way more" is a winner slogan, true or not , thats does not matter...
If instead of a closed speakers/room i was designing an open amphitheater space, details perception will be a priority instead of balance, as in ancient Greek theater where a whisper is heard with "details" of the voice tone as a goal...
When i modified my speakers port design, tweeter design and acoustic space i was looking for balance because balance reestablish naturalness with details which are not higher frequencies deceptive accentuation.
Anyway we must work with the frequency range specs of our speakers to begin with and help them to reach well balance impression with and in the room...