Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel?


I hear that the music fidelity of a multi-channel AV Receiver/Integrated amp can never match the sounds produced by a 2 channel system. Can someone clearly explain why this is so?

I'm planning to upgrade my HT system to try and achieve the best of both worlds, I currently have a 3 channel amp driving my SL, SR, C and a 2 channel amp driving my L and R.
I have a Denon 3801 acting as my pre. Is there any Pre/Proc out there that can merge both worlds with out breaking my bank? Looking for recommendations on what my next logical steps should be? Thanks in advance.
springowl

Showing 4 responses by chadnliz

Music is best (I feel) in 2 channel, but for movies, providing you have good speakers,and Amps all around) in my opinion 2 channel can never,,,NEVER equall the experience of 5.1,6.1,7.1.....true Audiophiles' should come to understand that movies dont fall into this realm, and thus should get on the HT bandwagon, for movies 2 channel is an antiquated idea and format...and ignoring the new technology is doing yourself an injustice....remember we are not AMISH!
I dont know, but to each his own I guess.

In my opinion 2 channel movies might as well be mono, compared to multi-channel for movies, that would be my take on this topic

2 channel movie= Mono
multi-channel HT= stereo
To me it is that big of a diffrence
I wond if a few decades ago people did this with AM-VS-FM?
If some one wants multi channel for home theater thats one thing, its not that hard to get a jaw dropping movie experience, but as far as HDCD and critical multi channel music listening everything is important.
That being said most are best off using 2 channel for music and getting center and backs plus sub for movies
Alos too many have these super over-priced 2 channel rigs and cant afford to up-grade so they just shit on anything that isnt 2 channel ignorance is bliss