Why Don't We See More High Current Electronics?


It seems that in looking around for amplifiers and integrated amps that double their power as the impedance is halved (high current), they seem to be in a minority. Is it just more costly to build good-sounding high current electronics and the market demand for them just isn't there, or what?
foster_9

Showing 4 responses by ngjockey

Not sure how this thread deteriorated into a philosophical argument. Typical example of the audiophile niche market.

"High current" has faded as marketing buzz word. That's all. Still continues as a design philosophy. Don't make me name names. Doubling down, well that requires, along with adequate power supplies, a specific kind of circuit and feedback, which happens to be the new buzz word.

There's one brand, to remain nameless but with unusual sincerity, that only tests the amp into 4 ohm power resistors, and only at 1 kHz. They divide that by 2 for the rating into 8 ohms. They also claim stability into 2 ohms. It's a good brand and an impressive amp so I'm not disputing. Just saying that advertised ratings are not real-life, reactive loads.
Looking down the list for my interpretation of your electronic/price/weight criteria:

Sale pending: BAT VK500 (105 lbs), Threshold S500

Used: Belles 350A Reference

New: W4S ST-1000
Assumed you had some kind of passive. The 400 ohm Zout of the Cary should not be a concern even for an amp with 10Kohm Zin.

The 3.5 ohm minimum (4.25 - ultimateavmag) of the speakers isn't that critical either, unless it's coincides with a big phase angle, which it doesn't on those. In fact, they tend to be a little midbass heavy, peaking with the minimum impedance at about 90 Hz. Yes, they benefit from the bass control of a strong amp but, along with the titanium tweeter and some high frequency fluctuations (sibilance?), I think you're going the wrong way. Although, you could do much worse than the ones mentioned.
@Unsound... That's because I've been laid up and bored to tears after knee arthroscopy.