Why do I see more Vandersteen model 3s vs model 2s for sale?


Just wondering about something I've noticed on the audiogon.com website over the past few months. It seems when Vandersteen speakers pop-up for sale a good percentage of them are the model 3's. Based off what I know about Vandersteen it seems like there should be a lot more Model 2's for sale based off of overall units sold. Anyone else notice this? What could be the reason?
I currently have the Model 2c's (SNs around 27K, I believe) and they are a great speaker. When I upgrade I either want the latest version of the model 2 (2ce sig II's) used, or used Model 3a sigs (also the latest version). I think the pricing would be somewhere in the ballpark of 1.8k for the 2ce sig IIs vs around 2.4k for the 3a sigs.
Would I be better or getting the model 2's or springing an extra $700 on the model 3's?
Just wanted to get some input on this. 3A sigs seem like the logical choice, but seeing so many for sale compared to the model 2's make me hesitant. Thanks for any insight.
bstatmeister

Showing 3 responses by ctsooner

I agree with Bob. I know for a fact that the veneering that is done at Vandersteen is top notch. I too build furniture for fun with a buddy (I have MS and can't pick up large boards or use power equipment some of the time so he keeps me honest and safe) and have spoken with them a few times about finishes. I personally went an upgraded Audi Havana Black as many know (perfect finish when I used a magnifying glass).  Call first.

As for what to get, that's not easy.  Read and reread Johnny's post. He knows Vandersteen's as well as anyone else's.  

As for a powered speaker, I love them. That's why I went with the Quatro CT.  It's killer when setting up compared to adding subs, but their new Sub 3 will be so easy to set up wiht the built in EQ.  

2's or 3's????  Golden Ear as someone posted?  The Golden Ear will be much brighter than any of the Steen's IMHO.  That's not a bad thing, it's just not quite as tonally accurate, but it's a fun speaker and a good choice.  I personally feel that in the range you are in, The 2's are the best value new...That's new price.  Who knows if you can get a recent model used as very few come up and Vandersteen owners most often listen to their ears and buy them and don't worry about what the latest positive review says about speaker of the month club.  Not a knock on any other speakers, just the publications, lol....

You have to figure out what's important.  IF you can fit the 3's in the room, then it's a no brainer.  There is a reason Richard makes it....IT'S BETTER....I personally feel that it's a lot better.  It's easier to integrate them into a room, that it will be to integrate the subs and a 2 IMHO.

let use know what you are doing.
Great posts guys.   You all make sense, because we all have our own priorities etc...  I can vouch for Tomic and Richard wanting to know about any problems, but what makes it worse is that you said I was at a dealer.  I've personally never sen anyone's speakers have such a problem that you can see the MDF.  I have only used veneer a few times for box work.  Nothing as large as a speaker cabinet.  

I too love to work with sap wood on certain types. Walnut is great as can be cherry.  Some of the exotics I get have some cool sap wood.  

I work mostly with highly figured quarter sawn white oak as I make mostly Arts and Crafts furniture with a buddy.  Have MS and can't carry boards and Al sees when I can't do certain things, lol. 

Bob, let me know and I'll see if I can get a ride down....would be fun.  Won't be able to go anywhere for a few weeks as I recover from my surgery last week.
Yes, the older guys were like that for the most part.  Mark Levinson couldn't do that since he never designed anything.  Tom C did all of that and Mark marketed and sold the stuff, lol.