Why aren't there more women on audiophile forums?


I've seen this question bandied about on forums frequently. Here's a long analysis of the subject matter.  For those going to the beach and needing a read, the whole dissertation is available for download.

"Masculinity and gear fetishism in audio technology community discourse"
Annetts, Alex (2015)
Doctoral thesis, Anglia Ruskin University.

"This thesis is a study of audio technology community discourse and its historical features. I contend that the audio technology domain is fundamentally exclusive and hierarchically stratified, based on discursively inscribed prerequisites to participation and enunciation, notably a hegemonic masculine performance, gear fetishism and the articulation of technical knowledge.

I show that communities organised around audio technology, socially construct and perpetuate these features as components of their respective discourses. I expose all three elements to be rooted in culturally embedded gender stereotypes, dating back to a nineteenth century dichotomy of public and private space.

I present a deconstruction of the complex discursive performances of masculinity and offer opportunities for privileged masculine recordists to critically reflect upon their dominance and homogeneity within the domain as an original contribution to knowledge. In this endeavour, I investigate the emergence and development of exclusive tropes as components of audio technology culture, and demonstrate how they continue to be perpetuated in the face of both social and technological developments that offer possibilities to destratify the community hierarchy and enunciative function.

My methodology is based on a comparative discourse analysis of industry and academic texts, as well as the communities that surround and influence the construction of modern audio technology discourse. Case studies are conducted of two leading industry publications: Tape Op and Sound On Sound, and supplemented by an exploration of Women's Audio Mission. I combine these sources with interview material gathered from relevant industry professionals. In doing so, I observe how the audio technology community has maintained barriers to participation, often in the face of technological progress that offers supposed opportunities for democratisation. My work presents an argument against this notion, exposing the supposed democratisation as an illusion of accessibility and thus as mere massification."

https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/702044/
hilde45

Showing 6 responses by millercarbon

The subject itself is political. Close it. Please. Until then the best post remains:

Neo-Marxism has so skewed American politics that what most call "the right" is now mainstream America. What are the values of "the right"? Life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, the right to be left alone. These are total mainstream American values. These are total mainstream universal human values.

Universal everywhere that is but on the left. If you want to talk history, let’s talk history. Marx held that there are no truths, it is all about power, and therefore anyone who has anything took it by force and oppression. Marx held that the capitalists were the oppressors. Couple hundred million dead later, whole nations economically and spiritually impoverished, Marxism died a total failure.

Until that is idiot French (but I repeat myself) philosophers reincarnated it as Neo-Marxism. No longer is it rich against poor. Now everyone is divided into every race, and gender, and ability, on and on endlessly on, all of them oppressed by the evil white man and his hateful patriarchy.

If you want to think, intellectually or otherwise just think at all, mine is the model to emulate. The model of the Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, of Thomas Jefferson, Abe Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Jesus Christ. The model of the divinity of the individual, the sanctity of life, of free and open inquiry.

The other model is the exact opposite.

Choose wisely.
hickamore, you have just made the list of people to be responded to never again. Or, if you prefer, ignored forevermore.
Neo-Marxism has so skewed American politics that what many call "the right" is now mainstream America. What are the values of "the right"? Life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, the right to be left alone. These are total mainstream American values. These are total mainstream universal human values.

Universal everywhere that is but on the left. If you want to talk history, let’s talk history. Marx held that there are no truths, it is all about power, and therefore anyone who has anything took it by force and oppression. Marx held that the capitalists were the oppressors. Couple hundred million dead later, whole nations economically and spiritually impoverished, Marxism died a total failure.

Until that is idiot French (but I repeat myself) philosophers reincarnated it as Neo-Marxism. No longer is it rich against poor. Now everyone is divided into every race, and gender, and ability, on and on endlessly on, all of them oppressed by the evil white man and his hateful patriarchy.

If you want to think, intellectually or otherwise just think at all, mine is the model to emulate. The model of the Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, of Thomas Jefferson, Abe Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Jesus Christ. The model of the divinity of the individual, the sanctity of life, of free and open inquiry.

The other model is the exact opposite.

Choose wisely.
The progressive left embraces life, liberty, property, privacy, etc. --

The progressive left embraces life. That must be why they push no limits abortion and euthanasia.

Liberty- that must be why they dictate every facet of private life right down to how many liters of water my toilet can flush.

Property- that must be why they control rents and deny landlords the right to evict nonpaying tenants.

Privacy- that must be why they search without warrant everyone even thinking of getting on a plane.

Seriously, you pose and preen but your facts are hysterically wrong. Beyond wrong, opposite.

The progressive left seeks to abolish life- their official view is humanity is a cancer on the planet.

The progressive left seeks to abolish property: "You will own nothing and be happy" is their official policy goal.

Tribalist? I just clearly explained with facts and logic the universal nature of the right, which truly is classical liberalism. My argument deserves better than your silly wordplay. Honestly, your rhetoric is pure rhetoric. Not a shred of serious reasoning anywhere. I find it a whole lot more honest and effective to write clearly. Try it some time.

Here’s an idea- why not start with being honest with yourself? You think you know better, have a more elevated ethics, are above it all, and this entitles you to lord it over the rest of us. Just come out and say it. Free your mind. Then just maybe one day you will understand why you really have no right telling anyone else how to live.

Good point. Credit where credit's due. 'Specially since it ain't often due.
A more pertinent question might be, why exactly does this matter? 

You mean to tell me you don't know? You think this is funny? Are you daft? This is a DOCTORAL THESIS. This is an ACCEPTED doctoral thesis! Do you not read this stuff? ARE YOU DAFT?!?!?! This is what passes for serious thought at university level.

Yes it would be a joke if written by any one of you. Problem is, any one of you could have written it! Because this same Neo-Marxist ideology permeates from up there to down here. You just don’t realize it because you don’t use quite as many of the same pedantic stifled code words.

But you do all use them.

So, guess what that means? The joke’s on you.