I own Zu Definition 2s and have enjoyed them a lot over the past 2+ years. They are dynamic and rich and full and enveloping and capable of filling a large space with great music. Not at all lean or clinical. And, of course, full-range. (The reviews in Positive Feedback, HiFi Choice, and 6moons are pretty accurate.) The main negative is that they require some distance for the sound to integrate. The company is easy to work with and, as far as I know, have always honored their 60 day trial period. Of course, sending back speakers of this size and weight is not so easy; but the packaging is easy to reuse.
Who OWNS Zu Audio Speakers- Especially Definition
I have recently tried a number of speakers, and I seem to have a problem with them all sounding too clinical, especially as the volume goes past 95-100db. This is key; I enjoy my stereo most when the volume is up. I currently own MA GS60's. They do loud very well, but are too lean for my tastes.
Various stores, various equipment, etc., so I can't say it was a controlled listening experience. Some were in my home.
I'm figuring the Zu Definitions would be different- I'd like to hear from some owners and those that have taken up on the 60 day trial period. What's good, what's bad?
BTW, some of the speakers I have listened to and found wanting:
Magnepan 3.6
Focal 1037Be
Reference 3a Grand Veena
Monitor Audio GS60
PSB Synchrony One (actually enjoyed these most- great dynamics, but felt something was lacking in the highs)
Various stores, various equipment, etc., so I can't say it was a controlled listening experience. Some were in my home.
I'm figuring the Zu Definitions would be different- I'd like to hear from some owners and those that have taken up on the 60 day trial period. What's good, what's bad?
BTW, some of the speakers I have listened to and found wanting:
Magnepan 3.6
Focal 1037Be
Reference 3a Grand Veena
Monitor Audio GS60
PSB Synchrony One (actually enjoyed these most- great dynamics, but felt something was lacking in the highs)