As you've already noted, but, perhaps have underappreciated "other associated components contribute in a big way". With that said, as far a preference for "lots of detail but at the same time not the grain" I think the McCormack might edge out the Bryston. I would still choose the Bryston over the McCormack with certain speakers, and visa/versa.
Which would you pick between these 2 and why?
I'm looking for opinions between these 2 products and why you'd choose it. I've owned quite a few amps including some Bryston.
I realize all the other associated components contribute in a big way, but all things being equal...
My current choice would be:
a) Bryston 3B ST
OR
b) McCormack DNA-125
Looking for some opinions
I prefer lots of detail but at the same time not the grain
Thanks for your input
I realize all the other associated components contribute in a big way, but all things being equal...
My current choice would be:
a) Bryston 3B ST
OR
b) McCormack DNA-125
Looking for some opinions
I prefer lots of detail but at the same time not the grain
Thanks for your input