Tim,
I'm a fairly good writer, but understand that sometimes things like sarcasm, jokes, and also rhetoric aren't always easy to pick up on in a medium like this forum.
The system I mentioned with two subwoofers belongs to a member of our local music club. I don't recall all of the equipment in his system, or the exact models of his subs, but he had Harbeth Super HL5 Plus speakers (which I purchased for my system after hearing his) and one JL Audio and one Rel sub.
I'm not sure I have the vocabulary to describe it, but the bass in his system was immediate, articulate, and powerful when bass notes were present, but not overwhelming. He had a lot of room treatment (bass traps, diffusers, absorption panels, maybe more) and if I recall, his subs were placed in opposite corners of the room. He mentioned that he had endlessly tweaked his system to achieve the bass performance we heard.
There were about six or seven of us there and we all took turns sitting in different seats during our listening. There was of course a "sweet spot" for the best imaging from the speakers, but the bass had no noticeable peaks or nulls in any of the spots where I sat. It was a relatively small room (maybe 16 X 20 feet?), but it opened into another room on one side. To my ears, it was one of the best, maybe even the best system that I've heard. The clarity of the speakers, the soundstage, the imaging, the integration between the subs and the speakers were all sublime. That's not to say it might not have even been better with another sub or two, but it was a really involving and dynamic listening experience with no apparent flaws that jumped out at me.
My room is bigger and has a few nooks and crannies and opens into my kitchen/dining room. I have four subs - two Rythmik F25 subs and two SVS SB13 Ultra subs in my system. It sounds great, and I don't notice any peaks or null spots and when I listen from my kitchen, there's no "boominess" or "one note bass", but it's not as dynamic as his system was. My guess is that has more to do with the quality/power of his subs and the sound treatment in his listening space. I've been adding room treatments and continue to experiment with placement of both the speakers and subs, sub settings, and other variables.
I enjoy my system, but that system set a benchmark for me of what's possible. That includes comparisons to a $100K system in a dealer showroom, and a number of other systems, both in treated showrooms at dealers and other friends who have high-end systems. I appreciate and enjoy my system and have put it together on a relatively modest budget. Employing four subs definitely took it to another level, using equipment I already had, but had only used for home theater in the past.
I'm a fairly good writer, but understand that sometimes things like sarcasm, jokes, and also rhetoric aren't always easy to pick up on in a medium like this forum.
The system I mentioned with two subwoofers belongs to a member of our local music club. I don't recall all of the equipment in his system, or the exact models of his subs, but he had Harbeth Super HL5 Plus speakers (which I purchased for my system after hearing his) and one JL Audio and one Rel sub.
I'm not sure I have the vocabulary to describe it, but the bass in his system was immediate, articulate, and powerful when bass notes were present, but not overwhelming. He had a lot of room treatment (bass traps, diffusers, absorption panels, maybe more) and if I recall, his subs were placed in opposite corners of the room. He mentioned that he had endlessly tweaked his system to achieve the bass performance we heard.
There were about six or seven of us there and we all took turns sitting in different seats during our listening. There was of course a "sweet spot" for the best imaging from the speakers, but the bass had no noticeable peaks or nulls in any of the spots where I sat. It was a relatively small room (maybe 16 X 20 feet?), but it opened into another room on one side. To my ears, it was one of the best, maybe even the best system that I've heard. The clarity of the speakers, the soundstage, the imaging, the integration between the subs and the speakers were all sublime. That's not to say it might not have even been better with another sub or two, but it was a really involving and dynamic listening experience with no apparent flaws that jumped out at me.
My room is bigger and has a few nooks and crannies and opens into my kitchen/dining room. I have four subs - two Rythmik F25 subs and two SVS SB13 Ultra subs in my system. It sounds great, and I don't notice any peaks or null spots and when I listen from my kitchen, there's no "boominess" or "one note bass", but it's not as dynamic as his system was. My guess is that has more to do with the quality/power of his subs and the sound treatment in his listening space. I've been adding room treatments and continue to experiment with placement of both the speakers and subs, sub settings, and other variables.
I enjoy my system, but that system set a benchmark for me of what's possible. That includes comparisons to a $100K system in a dealer showroom, and a number of other systems, both in treated showrooms at dealers and other friends who have high-end systems. I appreciate and enjoy my system and have put it together on a relatively modest budget. Employing four subs definitely took it to another level, using equipment I already had, but had only used for home theater in the past.