The solution of to how to best describe sound in writing is simple.
Don't try.
The only way it should be done is via A/B employing your ears.
In other words, do the reviews on Youtube with audio
actually demonstrating the point a reviewer is trying to make.
Now you say the audio quality sucks on a laptop.
You could still discern differences between wet and dry,
fat and skinny, Polite and forward.
Using the written form to describe audible differences is
not going to work. People will simply read the material and
then make an interpretation that seems correct.
Highly inaccurate methodology it seems to me.
Admittedly this might abbreviate most written reviews by 80%
but hey it is our time they are wasting.
Ozzy welcome to the world of audiophiles.
Thank you for showing us the Emperors New Clothes!
Let's hope this economic shakedown brings a sobering reality
long needed back to audio.
Don't try.
The only way it should be done is via A/B employing your ears.
In other words, do the reviews on Youtube with audio
actually demonstrating the point a reviewer is trying to make.
Now you say the audio quality sucks on a laptop.
You could still discern differences between wet and dry,
fat and skinny, Polite and forward.
Using the written form to describe audible differences is
not going to work. People will simply read the material and
then make an interpretation that seems correct.
Highly inaccurate methodology it seems to me.
Admittedly this might abbreviate most written reviews by 80%
but hey it is our time they are wasting.
Ozzy welcome to the world of audiophiles.
Thank you for showing us the Emperors New Clothes!
Let's hope this economic shakedown brings a sobering reality
long needed back to audio.