What’s wrong with Diana Krall?


Just wondering if anybody else saw Diana Krall on tour this past summer. I had been a very big fan and had previously seen her live years ago in San Francisco and Tampa/St. Pete. My recollection was that she was amazing in concert...she played flawlessly, she was engaging, and her ensemble was very tight. However, I took my wife to see her this past June in Memphis...man what a disappointment. First, they were 20 minutes late hitting the stage. Diana seemed like she was under some chemical influence...she mumbled her requisite bon mots to no one in particular, forgot lyrics to some songs (!), and basically took most of the night off, letting her bandmates do an extended jam session with lengthy solos on every song! Looking at customer reviews from her performances at other venues, this had apparently been going on for quite some time. Her whole set, including a halfhearted encore, was only about an hour. God, I hope she is ok and pulls herself together...what a terrible waste if she can’t.
jtkmd1

Showing 3 responses by french_fries

SHE'S PRETTY GREAT IN MY OPINION. OTOH, I saw Frank Zappa, who was undoubtably a genius, play brilliantly in one concert and played badly (he stunk IOW) at another concert, which turned out to be a total waste of time. Dianne's"live in Paris" record is truly wonderful- she seems so in touch with the audience where she (apparently) gets a lot of inspiration from. It is too bad musicians aren't always in touch with that "thing" that makes them play their hearts' out. But I reject those people that say she's not talented. No, she's not MCcoy Tyner, but she sings with real feeling AND plays at the same time, and has a terrific ensemble on stage with her. She does over play the sex appeal thing but she has to please the record company until she comes out on her own label.
speaking of... I could do without some of Ella Fitzgerald's recordings, and she is in a class by herself. She belabors some of her songs in live settings, over-embellishing, scatting endlessly, just getting on my nerves.
Is that/should that be significant? Not really, but when she sings "the American songbook" in the studio, I melt into my chair. Yellow Basket is so silly it's magnificent. Is all of Billy Holliday's material great? When she was stoned and her voice was at 30%? Do I love her? Of course. We tend to judge people out of context to the time, the venue, the amount of energy a performance demands. Were the Beatles always on THEIR game? What about the New England Patriots? They lost to Miami on Sunday?? That made me happy, but it NEVER should have happened, right?  Don't lecture jazz fans about who's perfect and who's not.
Orchestras have time to prepare and time to rehearse. Not everyone has 
that privilege. And even then the soloist comes down with the flu...
I am a huge fan of the Beatles, but the Rolling Stones wrote some pretty amazing material. I never gave them the full credit they deserved. 
There were many superb rock groups that also deserve a ton of credit for their contribution so I won't list them. But ALL of them had their "off" days. I can't imagine Mozart not finding the right notes for his latest score, but I'm sure it happened every once in awhile. Not Bach of course...