Have you looked into what the capabilities of the M1's MDx processor module upgrade are?
https://bricasti.com/en/consumer/mdx.php
Looking into the owner's manuals, you can use the Bricasti as a network DAC for a UPnP/DLNA server.
My guess is that if you discussed this with the folks at Bricasti, I would not be surprised if they consider this the best sound quality option for the M1 DAC, and you can then explore a good NAS option. If you wanted to get "audiophile", the Innuos products would probably work best.
The Innuous products are functionally an integrated NAS without a bunch of storage options on board. There are many Linn and Naim users who host their UPnP server on an Innuos or other products like it (Melco). I would not be surprised to find other Bricasti owners to be using the MDx with an Innous or other NAS using UPnP/DLNA and getting exceptional results.
On this note, this is also to me a huge blind spot on the part of Aurender. There is absolutely no technical reason Aurender could not include a feature to install a DLNA/UPnP media server on any generation of music server they have produced. It's a Linux machine running Ubuntu after all. Why not give a customer the flexibility to use the product in a different way if they decide to move/upgrade from a USB-based DAC to a network-based DAC? It's plainly obvious by now to anyone paying attention that network based delivery, whether it's UPnP/DLNA, Ravenna, Dante, Roon, or whatever comes down the pike, is how DAC manufacturers (including Bricasti) are improving their products and bringing them to the future. An Aurender customer owning an M1 DAC wishing to experience the MDx upgrade will be left sitting on a brick which can't deliver files over a network connection in any meaningful way. Sure, the Aurender software is nice, but there are plenty of easy to use media software apps. Their attitude is actually quite tone deaf, as is shown by their introduction of products which are essentially an Aurender-only, glorified NAS drive with CD ripping (the ACS10 and ACS100). Cornering these products to solely the Aurender ecosystem is a foolish approach, when they have plenty of capability to run a Roon Core or UPnP/DLNA server and give clients much more flexibility.
https://bricasti.com/en/consumer/mdx.php
Looking into the owner's manuals, you can use the Bricasti as a network DAC for a UPnP/DLNA server.
My guess is that if you discussed this with the folks at Bricasti, I would not be surprised if they consider this the best sound quality option for the M1 DAC, and you can then explore a good NAS option. If you wanted to get "audiophile", the Innuos products would probably work best.
The Innuous products are functionally an integrated NAS without a bunch of storage options on board. There are many Linn and Naim users who host their UPnP server on an Innuos or other products like it (Melco). I would not be surprised to find other Bricasti owners to be using the MDx with an Innous or other NAS using UPnP/DLNA and getting exceptional results.
On this note, this is also to me a huge blind spot on the part of Aurender. There is absolutely no technical reason Aurender could not include a feature to install a DLNA/UPnP media server on any generation of music server they have produced. It's a Linux machine running Ubuntu after all. Why not give a customer the flexibility to use the product in a different way if they decide to move/upgrade from a USB-based DAC to a network-based DAC? It's plainly obvious by now to anyone paying attention that network based delivery, whether it's UPnP/DLNA, Ravenna, Dante, Roon, or whatever comes down the pike, is how DAC manufacturers (including Bricasti) are improving their products and bringing them to the future. An Aurender customer owning an M1 DAC wishing to experience the MDx upgrade will be left sitting on a brick which can't deliver files over a network connection in any meaningful way. Sure, the Aurender software is nice, but there are plenty of easy to use media software apps. Their attitude is actually quite tone deaf, as is shown by their introduction of products which are essentially an Aurender-only, glorified NAS drive with CD ripping (the ACS10 and ACS100). Cornering these products to solely the Aurender ecosystem is a foolish approach, when they have plenty of capability to run a Roon Core or UPnP/DLNA server and give clients much more flexibility.