I primarily agree with Geoffkait. One never knows if a tweak will render a huge, minor or no difference in the sound quality, positive or negative. I find that the acoustics of a room is 50% of the sound quality. A big percentage. I was able to use Synergistic Research HFT system to remove all types of room treatments except for my Hallographs to greatly improve the sound of my system from adjusting room acoustics.
As to speakers, there are many fine ones out there and I chose the most cost effective ones for now which provide me with excellence in many facets, yet not the finest (or expensive) in any category. Not necessarily easy to drive as they have low impedences with high efficiency. I'm satisfied not spending $50K (Einstein, VR55K VS or Lumenwhite) to get 15% lesser performance at $2500 (Legacy Focuses used), although I am saving up to purchase one of those three in the near future (had the Focuses for 18 years). It took more effort to find a great pre-amp than speakers or amps. High[end quality pre-amps are really difficult to engineer well. The best ones I've heard are $10K+ (e,g, EAR 912) while some high priced ones are awful (e.g. Ypsilon).
As to cabling, I tried many cables but stick with a high end, moderate cost brand GroverHuffman cables. I've tried cheap Monster Cable ICs for poorer friends systems on my system (300s, earliest model of 3 300 types is best,usually $10/m on ebay) which were musically acceptable although rolled off the frequency extremes and were not great at retrieving detail. I also heard High Fidelity and Transparent Audio cables many times and thoroughly reject them in favor of Monster Cable 300s. Another inexpensive but really fine phono cable is a very low capacitance, silver coated 26 gauge copper solid core cable bought in bulk. Beautiful sounding at $40, my friend uses it instead of my $450 phono cables. So, the right choice of inexpensive cabling can work musically/sonically. As to using low cost, lower quality cables on a high end speaker/amp/pre-amp system, why sacrifice sound quality if one can afford much better cabling?
As to speakers, there are many fine ones out there and I chose the most cost effective ones for now which provide me with excellence in many facets, yet not the finest (or expensive) in any category. Not necessarily easy to drive as they have low impedences with high efficiency. I'm satisfied not spending $50K (Einstein, VR55K VS or Lumenwhite) to get 15% lesser performance at $2500 (Legacy Focuses used), although I am saving up to purchase one of those three in the near future (had the Focuses for 18 years). It took more effort to find a great pre-amp than speakers or amps. High[end quality pre-amps are really difficult to engineer well. The best ones I've heard are $10K+ (e,g, EAR 912) while some high priced ones are awful (e.g. Ypsilon).
As to cabling, I tried many cables but stick with a high end, moderate cost brand GroverHuffman cables. I've tried cheap Monster Cable ICs for poorer friends systems on my system (300s, earliest model of 3 300 types is best,usually $10/m on ebay) which were musically acceptable although rolled off the frequency extremes and were not great at retrieving detail. I also heard High Fidelity and Transparent Audio cables many times and thoroughly reject them in favor of Monster Cable 300s. Another inexpensive but really fine phono cable is a very low capacitance, silver coated 26 gauge copper solid core cable bought in bulk. Beautiful sounding at $40, my friend uses it instead of my $450 phono cables. So, the right choice of inexpensive cabling can work musically/sonically. As to using low cost, lower quality cables on a high end speaker/amp/pre-amp system, why sacrifice sound quality if one can afford much better cabling?