What is the “World’s Best Cartridge”?


I believe that a cartridge and a speaker, by far, contribute the most to SQ.

The two transducers in a system.

I bit the bulllet and bought a Lyra Atlas SL for $13K for my Woodsong Garrard 301 with Triplanar SE arm. I use a full function Atma-Sphere MP-1 preamp. My $60K front end. It is certainly, by far, the best I have owned. I read so many comments exclaiming that Lyra as among the best. I had to wait 6 months to get it. But the improvement over my excellent $3K Mayijima Shilabi was spectacular-putting it mildly.

I recently heard a demo of much more pricy system using a $25K cartridge. Seemed to be the most expensive cartridge made. Don’t recall the name.

For sure, the amount of detail was something I never heard. To hear a timpani sound like the real thing was incredible. And so much more! 
This got me thinking of what could be possible with a different kind of cartridge than a moving coil. That is, a moving iron.

I have heard so much about the late Decca London Reference. A MI and a very different take from a MC. Could it be better? The World’s Best? No longer made.

However Grado has been making MI cartridges for decades. Even though they hold the patent for the MC. Recently, Grado came out with their assault on “The World’s Best”. At least their best effort. At $12K the Epoch 3. I bought one and have been using it now for about two weeks replacing my Lyra. There is no question that the Atlas SL is a fabulous cartridge. But the Epoch is even better. Overall, it’s SQ is the closest to real I have heard. To begin, putting the stylus down on the run in grove there is dead silence. As well as the groves between cuts. This silence is indicative of the purity of the music content. Everything I have read about it is true. IME, the comment of one reviewer, “The World’s Best”, may be true.
 

 

mglik

Showing 8 responses by ghdprentice

OP,

 

The Grado Epoch 3 is a really beautiful cartridge. I look forward to hearing it some day.

 

My daily music time is 4 - 6 PM… and with it being summer.. the heat pump is typically on, not a huge noise but enough to mask the detail of my analog end… so for now I stream all the time. I am looking forward to the Fall when analog will again be a great choice.

In the assault of the high end I think there are at least two or three value camps. One would be high resolution and another maybe natural / musical and forgiving. You could probably come up with a couple more. 
 

But I get what Mike is asking… there are a few extraordinarily cartridges out there that satisfy some end groups desires.

@mijostyn

+1

Absolutely. The resurgence happened in response to the unending disappointment in the CD. But at last digital… both CD and more importantly streaming has reached equal or better (high Rez streaming) sound quality in many component combinations and will continue advancing. Without the sound quality advantage vinyl just becomes nostalgic.

 

@atmasphere

 

Sure, vinyl advances… but it is a loosing battle. Increasingly it becomes a question of your playback choices… and a question on your time frame. Adding the convenience… more and more people will put their money into digital… especially the MP3 folks… they will try better digital before attempting analog. All this amounts to a diminishing market for analog.

 

If I had an extra $100K right now I would definitely throw a good portion of that at analog. No question that will buy me the best playback… but I am 70 years old. If I was 45 years old or younger… I would invest in digital… it will just keep getting better and not require me personally collecting stuff that takes up space.

@atmasphere 

 

It is fun putting on an LP. Mine have almost no surface noice.

I have storage space on my streamers. I use it for about an hour a year. Wifi is only likely to get more reliable. 
 

I am pretty sure the single file on the cloud serving tens of thousands or millions of users. It consumes many times less energy than the same thousands of users, buying the vinyl albums or CDs… and having built space to store them. 
 

Server farms are able to store stuff at a fraction of the cost and energy of manufacturing and distributing physical media. One of the many things driving their build. Finally the distraction of forests for paper… oil for plastic disks is reduced by online stuff.

 

Data storage is becoming a utility. If something happens to your Qobuz account, in a couple minutes you can be up and running with a free month of Tidal. Besides, you have your vinyl. So, you are set.

 


 

 

@solypsa

 

Well, I have spent most of my career in IT. My first PC did not have a hard drive. I have been in charge of large data centers and implemented and been responsible for running multibillion dollar global corporations’ systems.

Digitally an album takes up 16 megabytes + or - 100%. This means you could store around 5,000 albums on one 4 tb disk drive. The environmental impact of producing 5,000 albums is huge… for one person! The environmental impact of producing one drive and servicing hundreds of thousands of people or more is minuscule. There are literally orders of magnitude differences between the two in terms of energy and environmental impact. 

@thekong 

 

Nicely put. 
 

I am also very sensitive to high frequency distortion and sound floor. I have practically gone running from some systems with my hands clapped over my ears while a couple other folks next to me were overwhelmed with how great the system was (detail at all costs… ? And damaged hearing?.

Cartridge rental. 100% cash deposit. I can’t think of many things more delicate and expensive. I will not touch one (and I shouldn’t, I am a cluttered). My dealer installs them.