What is the most analytical sounding amplifier that you have heard?


Some people like analytical and even consider this quality a signal of neutrality or honesty, so I don't want this to come off as a hate thread. ;-) 
seanheis1

Showing 3 responses by nonoise

That's very similar to what's accredited in her Jacintha Is Her Name CD.
Executive Producers: Ying Tan & Sebastian Koh
Produced by: Joe Harley
Recorded & Mixed by: Michael C. Ross at OceanWay Recording. Hollywood, Ca. November 20-24, 2002
Mastered by: Bernie Grundman using the Sony Direct Stream Digital System
Microphones: AKG C-12, C12A, KM-54, Neumann M-49, M-50, U-67, Sony C-12, Sennheiser 441, 421
Recording Cables: Audioquest
Photography: Gaelin Casey Photography
Hear: Marvin Lynch
Make Up: Karen Gilbert
Art Direction: James Lizard @LizardStudio.com

No mention of Mark Levinson equipment used. 

All the best,
Nonoise

To reveal all the details doesn’t have to mean the sound is sterile, etched or irritating. It means just what it says. Details have life just as much as larger matters and occupy space in the same manner.

Details have warmth and body but on a lessor scale.That’s all. Details contribute to the overall sound of the music, just like in real life. When I hear details properly portrayed, I get a more complete picture or mental image of the event, which is what this hobby means to me: to recreate the event as well as possible.

Hearing the leading edge of something in larger proportion than it should be is not detail. Nor are the sounds that irritate. That indicates something wrong with your system and not the music.

All the best,
Nonoise
Kinki Studio EX-M1. If you want to hear everything on a recording, you should give it a listen. 

All the best,
Nonoise