What is the best transport?


I want to upgrade my transport. I am using the Audio Note CDT 2. My dac is the Audio Note 2.1x sig. I have not yet auditioned any new transports, but have read up on the Audio Note CDT 4 and the Esoteric P-03.

Both of these are in the 16-18k price range. My budget can go that high. Will my dac be good enough or be overpowered?

What else is available which should be considered?
changeout

Showing 10 responses by charles1dad

Unless you always equate higher cost with higher performance, ericminer`s suggestion is correct. The PWT(memory buffer) is really a superb sounding transport and will be difficult to exceed with the much more expensive transports.
Not evryone agrees that computer audio is'better' like most things in audio it`s subjective. If it suits you then that`s fine. Some folks have a large CD collection and see no need to rip to a hard drive,again simply preference. Who cares what JA prefers,totally irrelevant to others individual needs. Either path can provide a satisfying solution.

The PS Audio PWT is just wonderful with my Yamamoto YDA DAC.
Joecasey,you missed my point with the analogy. Strong legion of supporters on both sides who won't sway the other. You state a properly configured computer set up always beats a transport.For you perhaps, but not true in others informed opinion/experiences. Blanket proclamations aren't persuasive, just another personal opinion.
For those who prefer to use conventional CDs the PS Audio PWT has memory processing. I believe this is a major factor in its ability to outpreform many of the expensive(traditional laser based transports).

I`m sure computer audio based systems can sound excellent,at this stage many CD users just are`nt 'compelled' to change just yet.I `m certain at some point in the future many will make that transition but there`s no great sense of urgency.
Dvave,
Very interesting and passionate thoughts! Computer vs CD transport is no different than the intractable tube vs transistor debate. There are simply two distinct camps and both have strong supporters. I can say I've heard some good sounding computer audio systems. A high quality CD spinning front end still reproduces music better sounding in my humble opinion. So I can relate to your stance.
Charles,
Joncourage,
I have`nt seen any "nays-ayer" posts,just people who are comfortable with what they have and who feel no need to change at this time. You`re happy with a computer based system, that`s your choice, who`s putting it down? What ever allows you to enjoy your music to your satisfaction is the way to go. Why do some people feel the need to get others to convert when they`re already content with their current individual choice?
I agree with Levy03 in that the PWT is really an exceptional product that offers very high quality sound.It does`nt surprise me the the PWT competes so well with the much more costly Esoteric.The PWT offers 'very high' value and will be difficult(not impossible) to top.It seems Changeout trusted his ears and was`nt swayed by the price tag psychology.The PWT and Yamamoto DAC combined is just devine and very involving.
Regards,
Onhwy61,
Agree, passionate doesn't mean right or wrong, just someone expressing a honest heart felt opinion. Thus my earlier tube/transistor analogy. All of this is merely subjective, choose what sounds best to you and be done with it.
Charles,
Alex,
You make compelling observations but again, some will counter and say switching power supplies can equal or outperform linear supplies. You mentioned " mechanical" sound and I know exactly what you are referring to. You and Steve (Empirical Audio) are well respected manufacturers who represent very informed but opposing views.I appreciate both of you, personal listening experience sways me toward your perspective.
Charles,
When all is said and done audio decisions are (should be) based on actual
listening as opposed to theoretical predictions. So with my ear-brain
processing I simply don't hear the superiority of computers. I understand
other listeners have drawn different conclusions from mine, so it goes with
subjective circumstances. I'm glad we have choices.
Charles,