WHAT HAPPENED TO SONUS FABER?


I look at the new speakers.  They look cheaper and they are not as musical.  It’s like they are trying to be what they are not. What the hell happened?
calvinj
Joey you are right.  It’s veneer. I hate to say this but when I looked at the Olympica and I was sad to see how they made it. I walked up and touched it and was puzzled. The cabinetry of a Sonus faber was special. Also the warm rich sound was the signature. It’s seems little by little they have started to go farther away from that. I heard the Lillium and I wasn’t impressed like I used to be by the sound of a Sonus faber. The sound would seduce you and you could listen for hours. It was also the most beautiful wood work I had seen in my life.  Not anymore. Watching what they have done makes me sad.
I am fortunate enough to have a pair of The Amati Tradition. This model is assembled in Italy.  The fit and finish are prefect and the sound is absolutely amazing.
My 5.2 system is SF and Rel.  Bought all the SF the same year to get identical drivers in each cabinet.  Integrates well.  It was hearing a SF concertino mini monitor that brought me back to this hobby.
Sonus Faber is not the same company anymore.  I have 3 pairs of speakers from the "Golden Age" of the company that still sound fantastic: 
Stradivari
Elipsa 
Guarneri Memento's
I know I’m getting sucked in by a guy who writes like a 7 year old.  For that reason alone I’m a fool.  There comes a time though when nonsense requires confrontation.  As a SF Olympica iii owner, I know first hand just how monumentally off base cj is re: the quality of the more modern SF products.  The upper end products are produced by hand in Italy.  The materials incorporated in the build and design of the Olympica are world class and uncompromisingly beautiful. Fit and finish is perfect.  I’ve read the side walls of the speakers are a walnut laminate over mdf, no surprise there: wood laminates are structurally superior to solid wood.  Laminated wood products are used extensively in furniture, building materials, and flooring (as examples) due to structural stability and as substrates to accept a variety of finish veneers.  Compared to older SF models, do the more recent iterations sound different?  Geez, I would hope so!  Different design teams, different ownership, maybe even a different targeted customer base.  If my Oly iii’s sounded any warmer or richer I’d probably sell them. They are a great blend of old and new imho.  If I want a more ‘traditional’ sounding SF, I’ll buy a pair!  It’s not as though they aren’t available.  

I’ve spent too much time reading about speakers lately; to learn, fantasy shop, maybe even to change speakers.  I enjoy reading pro and owner reviews, it’s entertaining!  I can afford to purchase just about anything I read about, though six figure speakers need not apply - I just feel it would be an example of irresponsible and conspicuous consumption in my part to even consider speakers in that price range.  

I’ve auditioned speakers in shops, I’ve talked with shop owners whose opinions I respect. I’ve talked with manufacturers and distributors. I’ve owned probably a dozen different manufacturers over the last 40 years. Why haven’t I dumped these new fangled, poorly constructed, non SF sounding speakers?  Well: great blend of warmth and detail, gorgeous to look at, huge soundstage, perfect size, not too heavy but very substantial, fantastic fit and finish, extremely easy to just sit and and listen get lost in the music. And that’s just a beginning. 

This thread is a perfect example of irresponsible reporting and a reason I don’t post often.  There’s an incredible amount of immature, agenda driven, nonsense based posting that it just degrades the whole point of the forums.