Good one, inna. Sheldon Cooper, where are you?
Best to you inna, Dave
|
Hi inna,
"Jim of Purist is a former NASA engineer so he can have interesting ideas."
And a super guy too. Not far from my home...
Best to you inna, Dave
|
One attracts another and so it goes... |
randy-11,
Audiodom already has enough audio cheapskates. Your points of view have been more than thoroughly exhausted by droves of others before you. Those of us that have been around more than 10 minutes have read and heard it all. You are posting such things all over Audiogon. Give it a rest. Years from now, you will re-read your posts and regret.
Best to you randy-11, Dave |
Ouch Randy! Perhaps you are better suited by other forums, but please don’t tell them that we sent you.
Best to you Randy, Dave |
Randy,
Now we have a third lesson regarding you:
3) You are infantile.
I submit that these three are more than enough. Shoo, shoo, horsefly.
Best to you Randy, Dave |
"...I have tested these things for decades and cables are about the last thing to do (usually); interconnects would come after speaker cables"
"FWIW, I have Kimber on my speakers - and I got them at a very large discount - I consider having them bi-amped to be more important"
Randy, we learn only two things from all of the posts you have made:
1) You are an objectivist and an extremely slow learner. 2) Your simple single reply to the OP’s question, "What do audiophiles want from a cable?", could have graciously been, "Whatever is most heavily discounted".
No insult or disrespect is intended to my friend Ray Kimber nor to his fine cable products.
Best to you Randy, Dave
|
Case closed. jmcgrogan2 was right. Hopeless. |
|
Good morning Mr. Kait,
Good point. So we should be describing how various signal transmission products handle the electromagnetic wave. I will buy that. Perhaps that is why some of the latest higher-technology cable/powercord/power treatment products have moved in this direction (EM cells (SR) and magnetic enhancement (HF), for example) and away from massive windings of large-gauge conductors long thought to be indicative of a superior conductive interface?
Best to you geoffkait, Dave
|
Hi inna,
I haven’t heard any of his cables/cords since RMAF several years back. Fantastic sound and I am sure that his stuff is much better now.
I still have a 10ft pair of Maximus XLR ICs (using in HT system) and a 2m pair of Aqueous RCA ICs (used in vintage system). Antiques. lol.
I contacted Jim about 10 years ago (cables were ~ 10 years old then) about refilling both with his nectar. He told me just to sent them in and he would take care of it and pay return shipping. He did so, and quickly at that. Awesome,
They need another refill. I wonder if Jim can resist laughing when I call him this time.
Best to you inna, Dave |
Hi inna,
Whatever Jim decides to do is fine by me. I have gotten my money's worth from these cables many times over. Maybe the Ferox will make them sound, uh, "Zippy"...
Best to you inna, Dave
|
Hi chrisr,
What is your opinion on the potential of liquid for rejection of RF/EMI before reaching the conductor?
Best to you chrisr, Dave
|
Hey Geoff,
Sounds like maybe this is rocket science after all?
Best to you Geoff, Dave |
"I am a cable denier, but the Shunyata cords were clearly better than my existing cables, no question."
This statement speaks for itself.
|