2. misc-audio
  3. 178896-104877

Washington Post article on MoFi vs. Fremer vs. Esposito

Here's a link to a Washington Post article on the recent dustup with MoFi. The comments section (including posts by Michael Fremer) are interesting.

Disclaimer: This is a "public service announcement, a point Im adding since some forum members complained the last article I referenced here was "paywall protected", I'll note that, for those who are non-subscribers, free access to limited numbers of articles is available by registering (trade-off: The Post will deluge you with subscription offers)

kacomess

Showing 3 responses by mijostyn

mijostyn's avatar
mijostyn
8,570 posts
 

MoFi is no more guilty of an ethical breach than any other advertiser. They all lie. The pharmaceutical industry is addicted to this game. 

mijostyn's avatar
mijostyn
8,570 posts
 

This will never get to court. As a case this is not worth the time of day because the financial damage done to any one individual is minute. The reward for staging a class action suite would not be worth a law firms time and effort. Some fly by night lawyer may try to scare MoFi out of a settlement but that is about it. No self respecting law firm would ever take this case it simply is not worth enough.

mijostyn's avatar
mijostyn
8,570 posts
 

What a fabulous....intervention.

What I do not understand is why the article did not mention that the vast majority of records are now recorded in digital. Only records recorded before 1981 are sure to be analog. 

MoFi is guilty of misrepresentation. But the fools are a certain journalist and his "only analog" following.  

More to discover